PBP projects for R/C models


Closed Thread
Results 1 to 40 of 772

Hybrid View

  1. #1
    Join Date
    Nov 2009
    Location
    Fitchburg, Mass
    Posts
    483


    Did you find this post helpful? Yes | No

    Default We have hear a problem in communication

    22 gauge will be snug and if you do your breadboarding like Darrel does it all should stay put.
    http://www.picbasic.co.uk/forum/atta...2&d=1278267329
    My 16F887 is attached to a Microchip PC board. It is the PICkit #2. My problem is getting ten signal wires off that board an onto a solderless proto board like Darrel used. Are you all suggesting that I do the whole job on a solderless board? If I were to do that, where do I get the solderless header that fits my Microchip provided USB connector? I'm pretty sure my 44 pin square shaped PIC will not fit. I need the long rectangle shape.

    Ken

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Nov 2003
    Location
    Wellton, U.S.A.
    Posts
    5,924


    Did you find this post helpful? Yes | No

    Default

    I use these with bread boards and the PicKit2
    http://www.allelectronics.com/make-a...-ANGLE//1.html

    The long rectangular chips are what they call a PDIP package. Much easier to solder when you get to that point.

    I would develop the project on a bread board with PDIPs and that might be the way to go with the kit also. It would low the students to experiment...
    Dave
    Always wear safety glasses while programming.

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Nov 2009
    Location
    Fitchburg, Mass
    Posts
    483


    Did you find this post helpful? Yes | No

    Default Is it so easy??

    Looks like all I need to connect to a PDIP 16F887 on a solderless board are the six wires from the USB device and two .1uf caps between Vcc and Gnd. The rest of the Microchip PICkit 2 schematic I do not use. (Some LED's would be nice.) Don't forget two isolated batteries. One for the DC motors the other for the logic.

    This is little considering the six Zettler relays, the SN7407, and a 5v regulator. Hmmmm

    Does this seem correct to you?

    Ken

  4. #4
    Join Date
    Nov 2009
    Location
    Fitchburg, Mass
    Posts
    483


    Did you find this post helpful? Yes | No

    Default Oh, yes, I forgot

    Power, Ground, Trigger and Echo to/from three sonars. Interconnections with the radio receiver and the wires that go to the DC motors and/or the Electronic Speed Control.

    If this could all be on one board and the board could fit inside a little car.....

    Ken

  5. #5
    Join Date
    Nov 2003
    Location
    Wellton, U.S.A.
    Posts
    5,924


    Did you find this post helpful? Yes | No

    Default

    You may also want to look at the 16F886. Same chip as far as programming goes, less I/Os smaller foot print, 28 pins. Same data sheet as the 887.

    The same outfit with the headers has a 400 hole bread board that can snap together with others if you need more room.
    http://www.allelectronics.com/make-a...dboards/1.html
    Dave
    Always wear safety glasses while programming.

  6. #6
    Join Date
    Nov 2009
    Location
    Fitchburg, Mass
    Posts
    483


    Did you find this post helpful? Yes | No

    Smile A major break through - I hope...

    Here is a proto board that will carry all my parts and then some. Each board has two rows of 62 pairs of bussed 0.1" centers pin holes.

    http://www.circuitspecialists.com/prod.itml/icOid/6888

    I need 20 paired pins for the forty pin 16F887, 48 paired pins for the 6 sixteen pin DPDT relays, 7 paired pins for the fourteen pin SN7407, 6 isolated pins for the USB device and three isolated pins for the 5v regulator.

    The board is 6 and 1/2 by 3 and 1/8 inches. That fits fine on my 1/10 scale hobby level SPRINT (the belt up the middle driving the front wheels is a problem that can be overcome) and my toy level 1.10 and 1.12 scale toy cars.

    Is that a plan, or what?

    Ken

  7. #7
    Join Date
    Nov 2009
    Location
    Fitchburg, Mass
    Posts
    483


    Did you find this post helpful? Yes | No

    Default PC and solderless incompatibility

    New unexpected problem.

    I have not been able to find socket headers that are compatible with the solderless proto board technology. All the headers are designed for PC use. This makes it very difficult to connect my six pin 0.1" centers USB connector device. It also makes it difficult to connect the servo PWM three pin cord, the Electronic Speed Control three pin cord, and the connectors needed for the radio receiver three pin male headers.

    I could cut and strip six 1/2" #22 lengths of solid #22 gauge wire and stick then into consecutive holes. The female connector would come in perpendicular to the board.
    This is not as reliable as 90 degree square header stock, but what choice do I have?
    Remember this is for middle school students.

    Suggestions anyone?

    ken

  8. #8
    Join Date
    Feb 2006
    Location
    Gilroy, CA
    Posts
    1,530


    Did you find this post helpful? Yes | No

    Default

    Glad to hear it. The bad news is that HPWM doesn't go down as low as 50 hertz, unless you use a really low osc speed. You have to go down to 0.5 mhz to get there. And, unfortunately you have to tell pbp that it is running at 4mhz. This will make a pause 2000 16 seconds. It can be compensated for, but a bit of a pain. And it limits you to 32 steps of speed. I think I talked about this back on post 199. Maybe that's why you tried to go back to PWM. But as you saw, PWM is effected by blocking commands, like pause.

    http://www.picbasic.co.uk/forum/show...5908#post85908

    I don't have a 16F887, but I just ordered a sample, so I can help test some options for you.

    Walter
    http://www.scalerobotics.com

Similar Threads

  1. PBP Book
    By Bruce in forum Off Topic
    Replies: 83
    Last Post: - 4th October 2021, 12:55
  2. PBP Extensions, What are they?
    By PJALM in forum PBP Extensions
    Replies: 9
    Last Post: - 28th September 2021, 11:26
  3. Compiler differences between PBP 2.33 & 2.46
    By nikopolis in forum mel PIC BASIC Pro
    Replies: 3
    Last Post: - 2nd May 2006, 19:01
  4. Newby- PBP wont compile for 18F (MPLAB)
    By jd76duke in forum mel PIC BASIC Pro
    Replies: 1
    Last Post: - 17th December 2005, 23:30
  5. Making PBP code more modular
    By forgie in forum General
    Replies: 30
    Last Post: - 25th October 2005, 16:24

Members who have read this thread : 1

You do not have permission to view the list of names.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts