Hi Andrew,
Would you like me to describe one method for producing up to 8 precisely timed synchronous pulses (on a single port), each pulse with a pulse width value of from 0 (off) to 1023 usecs with 1 usec pulse width resolution? If so, please let me know and I'd be happy to explain how the following code snippets work. I apologize for the C code.
Kind regards, Mike
Code:unsigned int pulse[] = { 120, // pulse 0 (RB0), 120-usecs 44, // pulse 1 (RB1), 44-usecs 45, // pulse 2 (RB2), 45-usecs 1001, // pulse 3 (RB3), 1001-usecs 0, // pulse 4 (RB4), off/not used 0, // pulse 5 (RB5), off/not used 0, // pulse 6 (RB6), off/not used 0 }; // pulse 7 (RB7), off/not used unsigned char toggle[1024] @0x400 // 1024 element (interval) toggle arrayCode:// // 1024 interval output routine (BoostC compiles the following // do-while code into a 5-cycle loop which is perfect for 1-usec // intervals with a 20-MHz clock). // void Output() { fsr0 = 0x400; // interval = 0 do // do { latb ^= postinc0; // { latb ^= toggle[interval++] } while(fsr0h.3 == 0); // } while(interval < 1024) }Code:// // build new toggle array from the pulse array before calling Output() // void PrepArray() { for(i = 0; i < 1024; i++) // toggle[i] = 0; // clear the array toggle[pulse[0]] |= 1; // insert RB0 output toggle bit toggle[pulse[1]] |= 2; // insert RB1 output toggle bit toggle[pulse[2]] |= 4; // insert RB2 output toggle bit toggle[pulse[3]] |= 8; // insert RB3 output toggle bit toggle[pulse[4]] |= 16; // insert RB4 output toggle bit toggle[pulse[5]] |= 32; // insert RB5 output toggle bit toggle[pulse[6]] |= 64; // insert RB6 output toggle bit toggle[pulse[7]] |= 128; // insert RB7 output toggle bit toggle[0] ^= 0xFF; // fix toggle[0] element }
Last edited by Mike, K8LH; - 16th October 2009 at 21:57.
Hi Andrew,
The disadvantage of this particular method is that you need a PIC with lots of RAM, something like an 18F2620, for the 1024 byte toggle array. If this is a one-off project then perhaps that may not be a big deal.
The PrepArray() routine builds the following (abbreviated) toggle[] array from the pulse[] array values and the Output() routine uses those values to update LATB as shown below;
Code:interval ^ LATB 0000-usecs toggle[ 0] = 0b00001111 0b00001111 RB3..RB0 toggled on 0001-usecs toggle[ 1] = 0b00000000 0b00001111 .... 0043-usecs toggle[ 43] = 0b00000000 0b00001111 0044-usecs toggle[ 44] = 0b00000010 0b00001101 RB1 toggled off 0045-usecs toggle[ 45] = 0b00000100 0b00001001 RB2 toggled off 0046-usecs toggle[ 46] = 0b00000000 0b00001001 .... 0119-usecs toggle[ 119] = 0b00000000 0b00001001 0120-usecs toggle[ 120] = 0b00000001 0b00001000 RB0 toggled off 0121-usecs toggle[ 121] = 0b00000000 0b00001000 .... 1000-usecs toggle[1000] = 0b00000000 0b00001000 1001-usecs toggle[1001] = 0b00001000 0b00000000 RB3 toggled off ....
The advantage of using a "toggle" data array and XOR'ing the values with LATB over using an "output" data array and simply writing the values to LATB is that the "toggle" array only requires inserting eight "toggle" bits into the array. An "output" data array would require inserting many many "output" bits into the array.
The Do-While loop in the Output() routine compiles to the following 5-cycle instruction sequence (by the BoostC compiler) for perfect 1-usec intervals (with a 20-MHz clock);
In your program you would edit the pulse array values for the outputs and then call the PrepArray() routine to build the toggle array. Then I suspect you would wait for some "trigger" event before calling the Output() routine.Code:loop: movf _postinc0,W ; xorwf _latb,F ; btfss _fsr0h,3 ; bra loop ;
Any of this make sense Sir? I'm rather pressed for time and that tends to make my rushed explanations rather useless to most people. Sorry...
Regards, Mike
Last edited by Mike, K8LH; - 17th October 2009 at 01:04.
More or less makes sense.
As I'm only juggling three outputs, I think I'll just sort the outputs into increasing time, calculate the incremental time between trailing edges, put them all on together and then pull them back down sequentially with PAUSEUS delays.
Thanks for taking the time to answer
Andrew
Last edited by AndrewC; - 17th October 2009 at 08:23. Reason: spelling :(
This last post made me to put on my thinking capI do this stuff within an ISR usually, but your case doesn't need it.
How about something like this. BEWARE : untested code
Code:Out1 var PORTB.0 Out2 var PORTB.1 Out3 var PORTB.2 AllOn con %00000111 ' all three outputs on Delay1 var word ' turn off delay for output1 Delay2 var word ' and 2 Delay3 var word ' surely this has to be for 3 RunDelay var word ' this is the running timer ' set all outputs on together TRISB = 0 Delay1 = 1000 ' in units of PAUSE time Delay2 = 2000 Delay3 = 3000 Loop: PORTB = AllOn for RunDelay = 0 to 65535 ' or whatever is the maximum you want ' this would be your cycle / repeat time if RunDelay > Delay1 then Out1 = 0 endif if RunDelay > Delay2 then Out2 = 0 endif if RunDelay > Delay3 then Out3 = 0 endif pauseus 10 ' this is the resolution of your delays next goto Loop
Bookmarks