Can PBP & 16f88 really do 9600,8,E,1

Results 1 to 39 of 39

Threaded View

  1. - 25th October 2009, 22:16 #30
    dhouston's Avatar
    dhouston
    dhouston is offline Prolific Poster
    Join Date
    Dec 2005
    Posts
    1,073

    Did you find this post helpful? Yes | No

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by retepsnikrep View Post
    0x87,0x40,0x58,0x15,0x6E,0x10,0x01,0x32,0x2F,0x2F, 0x04,0x39
    Code:
    checksum=BCMDATA[0]
For i=1 To 10
  checksum=checksum+BCMDATA[i]
Next i
checksum=~checksum     '1's complement
checksum=checksum+1    '2's complement
checksum=checksum & $7F
    For your example, checksum=0x39
    Last edited by dhouston; - 25th October 2009 at 22:18.
    www.davehouston.net
« Previous Thread | Next Thread »

Similar Threads

  1. PBP Book
    By Bruce in forum Off Topic
    Replies: 83
    Last Post: - 4th October 2021, 12:55
  2. PBP migration from 16F88 to 16F1827
    By RussMartin in forum mel PIC BASIC Pro
    Replies: 20
    Last Post: - 21st June 2010, 18:14
  3. PBP, ASM and LST files
    By HenrikOlsson in forum mel PIC BASIC Pro
    Replies: 5
    Last Post: - 12th January 2010, 13:43
  4. Compiler differences between PBP 2.33 & 2.46
    By nikopolis in forum mel PIC BASIC Pro
    Replies: 3
    Last Post: - 2nd May 2006, 19:01
  5. Newby- PBP wont compile for 18F (MPLAB)
    By jd76duke in forum mel PIC BASIC Pro
    Replies: 1
    Last Post: - 17th December 2005, 23:30

Members who have read this thread : 0

You do not have permission to view the list of names.

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts

Forum Rules