Hi, Charles
+1 for the bugs list ...
LOL ( Generally, the bug list is available with the next Upgrade ... eventually patch !!! )
Alain
Hi, Charles
+1 for the bugs list ...
LOL ( Generally, the bug list is available with the next Upgrade ... eventually patch !!! )
Alain
************************************************** ***********************
Why insist on using 32 Bits when you're not even able to deal with the first 8 ones ??? ehhhhhh ...
************************************************** ***********************
IF there is the word "Problem" in your question ...
certainly the answer is " RTFM " or " RTFDataSheet " !!!
*****************************************
Ioannis,
The PBP 2.5 manual in pdf or html format can be downloaded for free from the website melabs.com. So, I thought they probably posted the new manual so people can take a look at the new goodies before buying it.
All,
Yes, mecanique or whoever writes PBP is probably working in their buglist before releasing a patch with all the fixes. In the meanwhile, to avoid new headaches I will continue using my "old" PBP 2.5.
Robert
A good user-supported bug list would go a long way in making people comfortable with any upgrade. It would also be a good way for MELabs to get input. I'm certain that Darrel is doing a great job telling them what he finds, but he is only one person.
The problem with the "bug-list" approach is that without proper moderation, it could easily degenerate into an alternate PBP forum.
Charles Linquist
I've been considering a "known issues" list in the support section of our website. Would that help? Discussion could take place here on the forum, though I might need an email wakeup call occasionally. Once things are defined and confirmed, I could update the website with a summary.
All submitted bug reports are investigated, but only a few are confirmed. The investigation process is part of my support responsibility, as is the listing of the issues.
I believe there are currently two confirmed bugs in PBP 2.60.
1.) The WRITE command issue described in this thread. The best workaround is the define that Darrel mentioned:
2.) The header files 16F1826.BAS and 16F1827.BAS have bad register aliases. Each file can be corrected with:Code:DEFINE WRITE_USED 1
Code:PORTL VAR PORTB PORTH VAR PORTA ' PORTC invalid, change to PORTA TRISL VAR TRISB TRISH VAR TRISA ' TRISC invalid, change to TRISA
A known issues list would be a perfect solution for me.
The fact that I didn't know the WRITE problem existed scares me to death because I use that function extensively to store variables. My '8723's have 1024 bytes of EEPROM, so I'm often writing to locations above $FF.
Charles Linquist
The WRITE issue will always cause a compile error. There are no "silent" bugs in PBP 2.60 as far as I know. If you get a successful compile, you should be ok.
I felt the same pain as Joe, at first. All of our sample programs had to be edited to change the "loop" label. I remember questioning the wisdom of making LOOP a reserved word, given that our published examples had used the word as a label for so many years. In the end, after much consideration, it was decided that the utility of the DO..LOOP structure would be worth the effort for the majority of users.
The fact that 2.50C could easily be maintained alongside 2.60 was a factor in the decision. It seems that this capability should be made more apparent. I'll try to remedy this. Our policy has always been to never force users to upgrade and to always allow versions to coexist.
This seems like a good spot to point out that users should always run the latest patch for their version of PBP. We release patches when we feel that the number of fixes warrants it. The reason there were A, B, and C patches for 2.50 is because we found issues that we felt obligated to fix. Version 2.50 was a major change in PBP and it took a while for the fallout to settle. If you continue to use version 2.50, I highly recommend that you go to our site and download the 2.50C patch.
http://melabs.com/support/patches.htm
Ioannis is correct about the manual. Sometimes it seems like the thieves have our latest version before I do. We have resisted license keys and registration servers for a long time, but I don't know if we can hold out much longer. It may be that the inconvenience of a required registration would be offset by other conveniences that it would allow, like a downloadable manual. I would like to thank all of you who have resisted the temptation to share illegally and encouraged others to purchase a legal copy. PBP would not exist if it weren't for so many honorable users.
Hi,
Licence Keys ...
Yesss, looks fine ... but ...
The only thing I saw really working is the " DONGLES " ...
Knowing a society can sell you a " soft dongle " ( they are honest ... Dongles are for old " out of the market " progs - ; the Ultimate technology Scheme Capture / PCB / Routing suite i.e. ).
Those " soft dongles " also have a cost ... !!!
TO ME, this is the best protective device easily usable ... at low cost.
The miracle protecting device or key ??? I'd like to see !!!
Alain
Last edited by Darrel Taylor; - 25th August 2009 at 19:40. Reason: .
************************************************** ***********************
Why insist on using 32 Bits when you're not even able to deal with the first 8 ones ??? ehhhhhh ...
************************************************** ***********************
IF there is the word "Problem" in your question ...
certainly the answer is " RTFM " or " RTFDataSheet " !!!
*****************************************
Quote:
There is a reason that people of Melabs do not publish the New Manual immediatly, as the hackers are ready to distribute the software. Without manual the new version is a little useless to most. Ioannis.
Yes, that makes sense.
Robert
Hi Leo,
To address this issue:License keys are a reality, like them or not. I would like to see instead a serial numbered executable registered with MeLabs, so when the pirates sell their purloined product it becomes actionable by you in court. 1000 copies @ $250 + court costs and punitive damages = 1 million +
If you do not believe in MAGIC, Consider how currency has value simply by printing it, and is then traded for real assets.
.
Gold is the money of kings, silver is the money of gentlemen, barter is the money of peasants - but debt is the money of slaves
.
There simply is no "Happy Spam" If you do it you will disappear from this forum.
I was thinking that the WRITE bug was "silent".
I'm in favor of a key, but I don't like dongles.
Charles Linquist
If you do not believe in MAGIC, Consider how currency has value simply by printing it, and is then traded for real assets.
.
Gold is the money of kings, silver is the money of gentlemen, barter is the money of peasants - but debt is the money of slaves
.
There simply is no "Happy Spam" If you do it you will disappear from this forum.
Bookmarks