RS485 without a 555


Closed Thread
Results 1 to 13 of 13

Hybrid View

  1. #1
    Join Date
    Jun 2007
    Location
    Mansfield, UK
    Posts
    697

    Default RS485 without a 555

    Hi, I just had a random idea. Ive been using the 555 timer method to automatically switch an RS485 chip from receive to send. I was just thinking though, is the 555 part really needed? Couldnt i just fix the data input pin to high and connect the TX pin from the chip to the pins that change it to a sender (possibly through an invertor). This method would mean it changes to and from sender/receiver faster and requires less components (even if it needs an invertor).

    Is there a reason everyone seems to use the 555 method instead of this? Are there any potential problems doing it this way?

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Dec 2005
    Posts
    1,073


    Did you find this post helpful? Yes | No

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by The Master View Post
    Hi, I just had a random idea. Ive been using the 555 timer method to automatically switch an RS485 chip from receive to send. I was just thinking though, is the 555 part really needed? Couldnt i just fix the data input pin to high and connect the TX pin from the chip to the pins that change it to a sender (possibly through an invertor). This method would mean it changes to and from sender/receiver faster and requires less components (even if it needs an invertor).

    Is there a reason everyone seems to use the 555 method instead of this? Are there any potential problems doing it this way?
    The 555 switches from send to receive not receive to send. You could delay 25mS or so before switching the line direction or you could watch the output buffer to see when it is clear (not easy with a software UART) - the 555 does this automatically.
    Last edited by dhouston; - 16th August 2009 at 21:19.

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Jun 2007
    Location
    Mansfield, UK
    Posts
    697


    Did you find this post helpful? Yes | No

    Default

    When RE and DE are both low the chip is in receive mode. To send data both pins need to be high then the DI pin also needs to go high. All the 555 circuit does is makes RE and DE high when DI goes high then sets them back to low shortly after DI goes low. So i guess the question is really why is the slight delay needed?

    If DI is set to high permenantly then the data pin connects to RE and DE. When data is sent it switches the chip to send mode and because DI is already high it sends a high bit.

    Some of my circuits use a 555 and the really small ones use an IO pin to save space. If it could be used how i said then i could save an IO pin or a few components.

  4. #4
    Join Date
    Nov 2003
    Location
    Greece
    Posts
    4,132


    Did you find this post helpful? Yes | No

    Default

    Do you mean that your data are always 1?

    If it is, then sure youdo not need the 555. But what kind of data is always 1? Power supply?

    Ioannis

  5. #5
    Join Date
    Jun 2007
    Location
    Mansfield, UK
    Posts
    697


    Did you find this post helpful? Yes | No

    Default

    The data isnt always 1. When the TX pin goes low then the RS485 chip resets back to a receiver so the line goes low

  6. #6
    Join Date
    Nov 2003
    Location
    Greece
    Posts
    4,132


    Did you find this post helpful? Yes | No

    Default

    If the data line retuns to zero,that does not mean end of transmission. Do not get confussed.

    End of transmissions happens some time later. This "later" gives the 555 as a monostable multivibrator.

    Ioannis

Similar Threads

  1. RS485 splitter
    By The Master in forum Off Topic
    Replies: 0
    Last Post: - 30th August 2009, 06:04
  2. RS232 to RS485
    By The Master in forum Off Topic
    Replies: 22
    Last Post: - 16th October 2008, 15:37
  3. RS485 serial communication
    By mipie in forum Serial
    Replies: 5
    Last Post: - 10th February 2007, 13:15
  4. how to control 555 resisters with PIC
    By KB3BYT in forum mel PIC BASIC Pro
    Replies: 16
    Last Post: - 7th December 2006, 14:27
  5. Using 16f676 with comms
    By Peter1960 in forum mel PIC BASIC Pro
    Replies: 9
    Last Post: - 28th October 2005, 20:01

Members who have read this thread : 0

You do not have permission to view the list of names.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts