Ha, ha
so, we can see those who are following ... lol.
The filter has not being left active long enough for a significant majority to have been trying it ...
Alain
Ha, ha
so, we can see those who are following ... lol.
The filter has not being left active long enough for a significant majority to have been trying it ...
Alain
************************************************** ***********************
Why insist on using 32 Bits when you're not even able to deal with the first 8 ones ??? ehhhhhh ...
************************************************** ***********************
IF there is the word "Problem" in your question ...
certainly the answer is " RTFM " or " RTFDataSheet " !!!
*****************************************
"The squeaky wheel gets the grease."
And this attempt caused a lot of squeaking. From all forums.
So Lester removed it.
As a side note, the low life's automated programs still got thru while captcha was enabled.
Those dirty RATs.
DT
ok to avoid issues with those that are colour blind and those that cannot determine lower case from upper case
i've enabled a simple question and answer test .
short stupid question.
is it too difficult or confusing
any comments, post here.
suggest better questions if you like.
Lester:
I am thinking more in terms of using the MOTD(message of the day) function to get a message. Then prompt the user to type in a randomly chosen word position from the message to validate the posting.
for example : The quick brown fox jumps over the lazy dog.
prompt : type in the fifth word of the message
or : type in the highlighted word
answer to accept : jumps
result : bingo - you are a human
I do not know how hard it is to put this together, but it might be worth a try.
Actually as I tried to post this after a preview, the prompt had changed and I actually like what you have now.
Jerson
Once we have the "EDIT" button back, we'll be all set![]()
Steve
It's not a bug, it's a random feature.
There's no problem, only learning opportunities.
This does not seem to work at keeping out the spammers. I think only allowing Moderated posts for a newbies first few posts, and permanent banning of Spammer violators will work (those persistent enough to learn enough to pass the real vs spammer test), and that might not work.
In a forum, spammers are the electronic equivalent of having gang bangers crash your daughter's 11th birthday party. Nothing wrong with having bouncers. Might need more bouncers.
If you do not believe in MAGIC, Consider how currency has value simply by printing it, and is then traded for real assets.
.
Gold is the money of kings, silver is the money of gentlemen, barter is the money of peasants - but debt is the money of slaves
.
There simply is no "Happy Spam" If you do it you will disappear from this forum.
Bookmarks