RS485 Vs Wireless (TWS-434A)


Closed Thread
Results 1 to 4 of 4
  1. #1

    Default RS485 Vs Wireless (TWS-434A)

    Good day Picers!

    I'm planning, for a couple of years now, on a project that I need to do communication from about 5 "clients" to 1 "base station".
    The clients would be between 10 and 30 meters apart.

    I have two possible options for communication between the devices :

    My 1st option is RS485 using 4 wires to each client (2 for power, 2 for data).
    Will I be able to run the power and data cables in one cable unit (the same housing).
    The cable installation of the RS485 and mobility of the units would be a negative point.


    My 2nd option is wireless.
    TWS-434A and RWS-434 wireless modules from rentron.com
    Each client will run on rechargeable battery power and send data via wireless to the base station.
    Noise, reliability, complexity and cost would be a negative point.


    What would be the ideal option and what other implications will there be that I have missed?

    Thank you!

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Sep 2004
    Location
    montreal, canada
    Posts
    6,898


    Did you find this post helpful? Yes | No

    Default

    At least for the reasons you stated, and for such small distance, I tend to stay away of any RF when at all possible. So my suggestion would be to go to RS485 networking, but it's me.

    I agree, the wiring might be a pain, but oh joy for the reliability (assuming there's no chance that any handyman drill a hole or insert a nail in your wire) and ease of coding it
    Steve

    It's not a bug, it's a random feature.
    There's no problem, only learning opportunities.

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Nov 2005
    Location
    Bombay, India
    Posts
    966


    Did you find this post helpful? Yes | No

    Default

    I have worked on stuff like this using both the type of transmitter and receiver you have suggested and other transciever modules. This much I can say, RS485 is a breeze. Going RF is messy till you get it working. After that, it's a breeze. RF needs confirmations built into your protocol to make sure the message 'gets there'.

  4. #4


    Did you find this post helpful? Yes | No

    Default

    Thanks a lot, I will then go for the RS485

Similar Threads

  1. RS485 splitter
    By The Master in forum Off Topic
    Replies: 0
    Last Post: - 30th August 2009, 06:04
  2. Wireless Tachometer - Design Help
    By DanPBP in forum Off Topic
    Replies: 2
    Last Post: - 3rd May 2009, 09:06
  3. Replies: 2
    Last Post: - 29th September 2007, 06:49
  4. Using 16f676 with comms
    By Peter1960 in forum mel PIC BASIC Pro
    Replies: 9
    Last Post: - 28th October 2005, 20:01
  5. Wireless communication gear.
    By toalan in forum Off Topic
    Replies: 5
    Last Post: - 17th March 2005, 16:33

Members who have read this thread : 0

You do not have permission to view the list of names.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts