Oscillator Selection


Closed Thread
Results 1 to 6 of 6

Hybrid View

  1. #1
    Join Date
    Sep 2004
    Location
    montreal, canada
    Posts
    6,898

    Default

    Those USB PIC have a oscillator block that divide anything (well not on all mode but) down to 4MHz, then the internal PLL rise it up to 96Mhz, then you divide it /2 to have your expected 48MHz processor speed.

    So why using 20MHz (or else) instead of 4? I no longer see of any good reason apart if, for some reason, you have a bunch of those already in stock.
    Steve

    It's not a bug, it's a random feature.
    There's no problem, only learning opportunities.

  2. #2

    Default

    The PIC that was are looking to use is the 18F2550. We don't need a many I/O, just a handful and a USB port. The only reason I could possibly think to use a faster oscillator is for better accuracy. Does it not make sense that to say an oscillator running at 4 MHz +/-50 ppm will be less accurate than one running at 20 MHz +/- 50 ppm due to multiplying less to achieve the same results?

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Sep 2004
    Location
    montreal, canada
    Posts
    6,898

    Default

    This is what i thought as well... but it's still divided down to 4MHz at the end... and you still have +/- 50 ppm at the end too.

    We already talked about that here a while back

    http://www.picbasic.co.uk/forum/show...5&postcount=11
    Steve

    It's not a bug, it's a random feature.
    There's no problem, only learning opportunities.

Members who have read this thread : 0

You do not have permission to view the list of names.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts