Random Numbers

[BobEdge]

Thnx for the replies, as you can see i did have a loop like that right at the beginning of the program

jmp1:
random temp
if sw1 = 1 then goto start
goto jmp1

I first tried using a similar loop between each number fetching routine, but this meant pressing the button 5 times.

In the end i have used 2 pics. The first one uses 5 random vars to pause for random ammounts of micro seconds, and acts as the button press, the second one simply counts up until it sees a button press, then i use //9 to get the number from 0 to 8. checks to see if it is zero or has already been chosen & repeats if so.

In conclusion, the pbp random statement is the least random thing I have ever come across, a mate tells me he had a similar problem with visual basic, so it is not a flaw with PBP. I just wish the lottery used a computer, I might be able to work out the winning numbers.

Thanks for the help guys

[peterdeco1]

Try something like this:
LET X = 0

JMP1:
LET X = (X + 1)
IF X >=9 THEN LET X = 0
IF SW1 = 1 THEN START
GOTO JMP1

YOU WILL GET A RANDOM NUMBER FROM 0 TO 8. IT WILL BE TRULY RANDOM. IT IS POSSIBLE FOR THE NUMBER TO BE THE SAME WITH A SUBSEQUENT PUSH OF THE SWITCH.

[mackrackit]

Try something like this:
LET X = 0

JMP1:
LET X = (X + 1)
IF X >=9 THEN LET X = 0
IF SW1 = 1 THEN START
GOTO JMP1

YOU WILL GET A RANDOM NUMBER FROM 0 TO 8. IT WILL BE TRULY RANDOM. IT IS POSSIBLE FOR THE NUMBER TO BE THE SAME WITH A SUBSEQUENT PUSH OF THE SWITCH.

Not sure it can be called truly random. Given a certain amount of time the number will always be the same.

[mackrackit]

http://www.picbasic.co.uk/forum/showthread.php?p=57941

[skimask]

What I usually do when I need to use RANDOM, is to seed it with a 16 bit timer value, and then add a few other variables I've got around and always tie grabbing that random number with some sort of human interaction.
If you've got an event that relies on human interaction somehow (i.e. button press) and a tight loop somewhere, there ain't no way you're going to get a continuously repeatable result.
True, RANDOM in PBP isn't all that random, but when you start adding the 'YOU' factor to it, you can get decent results...

[Ryan7777]

Like maybe use a floating pin or some other means for a spare pin to pick up some "static" to generate an interupt or something?. But there again you may only pick up 60Hz (or 50), but i have heard of people doing this to get random randomness

[ruijc]

Like maybe use a floating pin or some other means for a spare pin to pick up some "static"

This has crossed my mind also ( didnt tryed yet though ).
I think that you can get decent random results using a spare pin with ADC grabbing nothing but noise.

You can then get 1 ou 2 bits from that "noise" which i believe it would be pretty random.

[locko]

This is untested, but was thinking of trying it someday....

The theory.
Leave an analog pin floating and take a voltage measurement to use as the seed for the random number.

Not sure how mach variation there will be in each of the measurements. The other thing would be to reduce the sample time for the conversion which may give to less accuracy and give better random results.
Also, if the pin is connected to a wire or long track, it should act as an antenna and increase the variation in the measurements.

Maybe some of the experts around here will have any ideas if this could work

Paul