how large and complex firmware you design using pbp?

[Charles Linquis]

A few more details - the main PIC communicates with a network of current, humidity and pressure sensors. Each of the remote sensors is built with an 18F2321. Every two seconds the main PIC sends three bytes - the address, a command, and a checksum to all the slaves using DEBUGOUT (since all the USARTS are already used). The appropriate slave sends back 4 bytes - the address of the slave, two bytes of data, and a checksum. Open-collector mode is used so that the outputs of the sensors can all be tied together on one wire (an 820 ohm pull-up is used). The slaves all respond to address 254 by default on programming. Whatever number is sent in the command byte to a slave at address 254 becomes the slave's new address and is stored in the '2321's EEPROM. This way a slave's address can be set without using jumpers. The slaves all run on their internal 8Mhz oscillators, and amazingly, communicate reliably at 19.2K baud with the master (which is running at 40Mhz).
I did have to modify PBPPIC18.LIB to allow DEBUGOUT (on the slaves) to run open-collector.

The slaves basically read their associated sensor(s) and then sit in a tight loop waiting for the main PIC to send their address and command. As soon as they recognize their address, command and checksum, they wait 10uSec and send the data back.


This is probably more than anyone wanted to read, but you asked...

[Ron Marcus]

I started on PBP, and have designed hundreds of programs for commercial products. I was tempted to play with Swordfish for 32 bit variables, but since Melabs released 2.50, I have had no need. The most timing critical app was a video on screen display using a 16F628 and gated oscillator. This I did in assembly.
Being an RF junkie, I recently started programming the TI 1110 and 2510 RF transceivers. These are 8051 derivative cores, so C was the only way to go. It was a real challenge going from PBPs "anything goes" forgiving language to a fanatically rigid structure of program writing, but it helped my coding style.
I still haven't hit my head with PBPs capabilities, but I'll keep trying!
Ron

[Archangel]

This is probably more than anyone wanted to read, but you asked...

Nope, sometimes the thought process behind the code is more valuable than a code example. Very interesting, Thanks Charles !
JS

[chrdcv]

Thanks Charles, Marcus and others!

Now I am really impression with your design and methods! One guy mention about swordfish compiler (http://www.sfcompiler.co.uk/swordfish/). I read more about the compiler and I like it. I dont know if it is so trustworthy how much melabs pic basic...

Well, I continue re-write and develop some code pieces in my spaghetti project and I will post in no longer future some doubts...

At the moment, Merry Christmas and Happy New Year!!!

[rmteo]

I use SwordFish and I think that it is heads & shoulders above any other BASIC compiler for PIC's out there. But then again, that is MY opinion.

The only downside is that it supports PIC18s only. Now, if it has support for the PIC24 and dsPICs, I would be in hog heaven.