Along the same lines, the data sheet for the part Alain points out has on page 11 another nice way of doing it.
http://www.google.com/url?sa=t&sourc...SILdHEv5RRcHYQ
|
Along the same lines, the data sheet for the part Alain points out has on page 11 another nice way of doing it.
http://www.google.com/url?sa=t&sourc...SILdHEv5RRcHYQ
Dave
Always wear safety glasses while programming.
|
Hi, DaveOriginally Posted by mackrackit
Not so nice ...
as the goal, here, is to take care the detectors are not saturated by light ...
Alain
************************************************** ***********************
Why insist on using 32 Bits when you're not even able to deal with the first 8 ones ??? ehhhhhh ...
************************************************** ***********************
IF there is the word "Problem" in your question ...
certainly the answer is " RTFM " or " RTFDataSheet " !!!
*****************************************
|
Maybe... but if the OPs part was to pass the two detectors causing the differential ?? then saturation may not be a problem ??
I am going to try it some day. Just an idea.
Dave
Always wear safety glasses while programming.
|
Halas !!!
when saturated ... your detectors won't "see" anything ... both of them !!!
no differential signal nor ...
Alain
************************************************** ***********************
Why insist on using 32 Bits when you're not even able to deal with the first 8 ones ??? ehhhhhh ...
************************************************** ***********************
IF there is the word "Problem" in your question ...
certainly the answer is " RTFM " or " RTFDataSheet " !!!
*****************************************
|
I am thinking along the lines of both detectors being saturated but spaced maybe a centimeter or so apart. When the piece being detected cast a shadow on one and not the other then the differential. I guess it would only work if the light source was coming from one direction only........Darn, now I am back to square one
Dave
Always wear safety glasses while programming.
|
From that datesheet, it said that the circuit will not be sensitive to changes in light as the source ages, this means saturate right?
That means I can't connect IR TX continously?
|
Hi,
That means aging will modify BOTH sources ... but "saturate" means the sensors ( not the source ...) cannot make any difference in light changes.
just as if you look straight at the sun ... you can't distinguish anything more in the sky , even in front of you !!! ( the model plane you should fly is a "good" example here ... lol : little chanche for you to keep it in the air ... )
Alain
************************************************** ***********************
Why insist on using 32 Bits when you're not even able to deal with the first 8 ones ??? ehhhhhh ...
************************************************** ***********************
IF there is the word "Problem" in your question ...
certainly the answer is " RTFM " or " RTFDataSheet " !!!
*****************************************
Members who have read this thread : 0You do not have permission to view the list of names.
Posting Permissions
Bookmarks