GROUND plane or nor GROUND plane


Closed Thread
Results 1 to 26 of 26

Hybrid View

  1. #1
    Join Date
    Jul 2003
    Posts
    2,358


    Did you find this post helpful? Yes | No

    Default

    I support Ioannis on this one... I put via's linking Ground planes on a 5mm grid spacing (at frequencies 50MHz to 2.5GHz) and at 3mm above that. Doesn't mean your circuit isn't going to work if you don't... just different approaches and points of view. You don't have to do this for your entire board... just the RF sections.

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Oct 2004
    Location
    North Norfolk UK
    Posts
    146


    Did you find this post helpful? Yes | No

    Default

    There is a book I have which is a very usefull basis for helping to understand ground planes amonst other things. It is written in very simple language well worth having as a reference book.

    Henry W. Ott. Noise Reduction Techniques in Electronic Systems . its old and should be in every college library, if not snap up a second hand copy will only cost you the price of a beer

    Placement and sizeing of ground planes and vias can get quite fancy, especially with multilayer boards, You can't just slap one on either side, it can do much much more harm than good, on a simple double sided board one only has to consider problems created by orphans (areas isolated by components).

    Take a look also at ground planes around external timing crystals and "rings" you may get some extra marks.

    ______

  3. #3
    Join Date
    May 2004
    Location
    NW France
    Posts
    3,653


    Did you find this post helpful? Yes | No

    Talking The reason is not that you wait for ...

    Hi,

    I ALWAYS use Ground planes ... reason is very simple :

    it uses MUCH less perchlorate or persulfate for engraving ...

    Surprised ???

    Alain
    ************************************************** ***********************
    Why insist on using 32 Bits when you're not even able to deal with the first 8 ones ??? ehhhhhh ...
    ************************************************** ***********************
    IF there is the word "Problem" in your question ...
    certainly the answer is " RTFM " or " RTFDataSheet " !!!
    *****************************************

  4. #4
    Join Date
    Oct 2004
    Location
    North Norfolk UK
    Posts
    146


    Did you find this post helpful? Yes | No

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Acetronics View Post
    Hi,
    it uses MUCH less perchlorate or persulfate for engraving ...
    Alain
    and therefore [b]much[b/] more plating solution....

  5. #5
    Join Date
    May 2004
    Location
    NW France
    Posts
    3,653


    Did you find this post helpful? Yes | No

    Talking

    And ... as plating thickness is much less than copper thickness ...

    in the End ...

    Alain
    ************************************************** ***********************
    Why insist on using 32 Bits when you're not even able to deal with the first 8 ones ??? ehhhhhh ...
    ************************************************** ***********************
    IF there is the word "Problem" in your question ...
    certainly the answer is " RTFM " or " RTFDataSheet " !!!
    *****************************************

  6. #6
    Join Date
    Oct 2004
    Location
    North Norfolk UK
    Posts
    146


    Did you find this post helpful? Yes | No

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Acetronics View Post
    And ... as plating thickness is much less than copper thickness ...

    in the End ...

    Alain
    in the End ... depends on copper um/cost of etchant vs plating um/cost of solution

    AND.... shelf lives of each solutions.....



    _____

  7. #7
    xnihilo's Avatar
    xnihilo Guest


    Did you find this post helpful? Yes | No

    Default

    It helped a lot Now I still don't know if my ground plane on the bottom side is fine or not (i removed the top layer ground plane). there's a program called EAGLE that creates the plane once you draw a polygon and name it like the ground on the board. Does it do it right or not? Hell if I know.

    A snapshot of the boards (when there were still a ground plane on both layers)
    http://users.edpnet.be/charlesetchri...0kit%20pcb.jpg

    By the way: I'm not using any RF device and my pic runs at 8MHz, 5V.

Similar Threads

  1. A PIC logic 0V output is not equal to a ground?
    By HankMcSpank in forum mel PIC BASIC Pro
    Replies: 5
    Last Post: - 17th November 2009, 18:47
  2. Connecting circuit ground to mains ground
    By The Master in forum Off Topic
    Replies: 2
    Last Post: - 12th November 2009, 22:02
  3. Etching and ground planes
    By DavyJones in forum Schematics
    Replies: 6
    Last Post: - 9th April 2009, 18:16
  4. Negative Numbers/Virtual Ground
    By scottl in forum General
    Replies: 1
    Last Post: - 7th May 2006, 21:35

Members who have read this thread : 0

You do not have permission to view the list of names.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts