How can I achieve this? (hand drawing a curve then mapping values to 1024 LUT

Hi All,

I'm trying to linearize LEDs for use with 1024 PWM (lots of different types of LEDs), but I'm finding it really troublesome ...I'm using a lookup table & using a 'hit & hope' method (&very* time consuming)...worse still when I get it 'close' for on LED colour, using the same LUT on another LED colour is often wildy different.

I need a quicker method for finding out the rough values need for each LEDs LUT.

it strikes me what I need is a way of manually hand drawing a rough curve on say my PC (S-curve, log, anti log etc), then getting this into my PIC LUT to see what gets me the closest visually (as I eyeall the LEDs)...so I need a way of being able to draw 1024 levels, then getting these values somehow or other quickly into a table that picbasic can use.

Any top tips?

tks,
Hank.

Unless you have all the time of the world, I would not recommend this way.

LEDs are current controlled devices. PWM is controlling the mean voltage that the LED receives. So, I think the way you try it is wrong.

You have to control, by the PWM signal, the current flow through the LED.

Then, you only have to find the min and max current the LED needs to light. Rest should be close to linear.

Ioannis

Hi Hank,

Not sure if this will help but I created an Excel spreadsheet that charted the gamma "duty cycle" values generated by the "anti-log" formula in that simple JustBASIC program I use for generating the anti-log gamma tables. Here's what the Excel chart looks like;

Attachment 6680

And if you've forgotten, here's the program I use for generating the gamma brightness level correction tables (using the free JustBASIC program as well as an example of the output window;

Code:

---

'  Leo Bodnar's 'antilogarithmic'
 '  gamma correction algorithm (Mike, K8LH)
 '
 '  JustBASIC (free) interpreter
 '
 Input "Gamma array size: "; arraysize
 Input " Total PWM steps: "; width
 Input "Gamma correction: "; gamma      ' try 0.5 to 1.0
 Input "Entries per line: "; entries    '

 FOR index = 0 to arraysize-1
    dcyval = INT(width^(((index+1)/arraysize)^gamma)+.3)
    if(index = 0) then
      dcyval = 0
      PRINT
      PRINT "  DW ";
    else
      if(index MOD entries = 0) then
        PRINT ","
        PRINT "  DW ";
      else
        PRINT ",";
      end if
    end if
    if(dcyval < 100) then print " ";
    if(dcyval < 10) then print " ";
    PRINT dcyval;
 NEXT index
 PRINT
 PRINT
 REM CLOSE

---

Code:

---

Gamma array size: 100
 Total PWM steps: 512
Gamma correction: .55
Entries per line: 10

  DW  0,  2,  2,  3,  3,  4,  4,  5,  5,  6,
  DW  6,  7,  7,  8,  9, 10, 10, 11, 12, 13,
  DW  14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 21, 22, 23, 25,
  DW  26, 28, 29, 31, 33, 35, 37, 39, 41, 43,
  DW  45, 48, 50, 53, 56, 58, 61, 64, 67, 71,
  DW  74, 78, 81, 85, 89, 93, 97,102,106,111,
  DW 116,121,126,132,137,143,149,155,162,168,
  DW 175,182,190,197,205,213,222,231,240,249,
  DW 258,268,279,289,300,311,323,335,347,360,
  DW 373,387,401,415,430,446,461,478,494,512

---

Good luck on your project.

Cheerful regards, Mike

Thanks guys (& sorry for the delay in coming back here)

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Ioannis

Unless you have all the time of the world, I would not recommend this way.

LEDs are current controlled devices. PWM is controlling the mean voltage that the LED receives.

---

But current doesn't flow without voltage, so in a roundabout way by controlling the mean voltage you are controlling the current.

Mike...thanks for reminding me (I do recall your spreadsheet now)....it's a really nice utility, but doesn't allow me to go off-piste with some odd curves ....but in the light that there's nothing else forthcoming, I'll likely roll with that again :-)


Many thanks.

If you control the current through the LED, the Voltage Drop on the LED will be varied in a very small percetage. Remember that it is a diode with a very steep curve.

So if you control the voltage drop on the LED, you have to control in steps of mV, in a very small range and NOT in linear fashion.

If you, on the other hand, control the current the voltage drop is left on the LED to be determined. Also current control can be linear.

To measure the current, you just need a small resistor in series with the LED and maybe an opamp to amplify it in the levels your ADC needs.

Then controlling the current (by PWM) of the LED you can get feedback just nicely.

Or use a cheap IC from ZMDI and control it by your PIC.

Soon I will have a power LED from Citizen (10 or 25 watts) controlled this way. I'll try to upload a video also.

Ioannis