> And I thought 'tools' was a 'male' thing... or am I posting on the wrong forum again? .
> and what about a ship i.e.???
Originally Posted by Melanie
> On the first day that I joined the Company I work for, my boss said to me "Don't come to me with a problem unless you have a solution". .
> The boss is here only to decide ... did you forget that ??? Here long legs ( 200 Yds etc, etc.) are a great advantage ... Lol !!!
I remember to have seen something called " The decider's tool " in a smart shop smelling leather and wax, during my last trip to London ...
It was Bronze, Silver or Gold plated , had the appearance of a big coin, and one side was YES stamped and the other NO ...
There were also there all these marvellous little things from Wedgwood ...
... an instant between sky and earth.
Was a pleasure to me ... to be on the wrong forum.
Alain
I thought all those testosterone battle was finished with the previous Heated Debate but it seems not... As almost everything has been covered many times ago, on many different thread, i think the only thing to add to is...
<img src="http://www.picbasic.co.uk/forum/attachment.php?attachmentid=404&stc=1">
And this apply to all of those that still believe that one tool is better than another. There's no better tool, you can do everything with one or the other.... is at least 1 people here understand that it's still assembler based and all the specific function are not much than Macros or Subs(call it as you want)
Somebody already post something like : If people could just mind to learn how to... I agree 100% with that. And once you know how, you just recall what you did in a Macro, Sub, Include....
Yes i use different compiler but there's only one i prefer in my list. The one that i'm most familiar, confortable. The one wich i know that if i get compilation error, the problem is located back to the keyboard...
The Best tool is the one you have... if you know how to work with.
Period!
Steve
It's not a bug, it's a random feature.
There's no problem, only learning opportunities.
... there's a deep satisfaction from making something work that on the face of it, at first glance, seems impossible with available resources (like floats, or trig or I2Cslave or whatever with PBP). And knowing it's all your own work just makes it so much more satisfying... not exactly orgasmic, but still satisfying...
I know what you mean Melanie.
After my first big assembly project, my PICStart Plus asked, "Was it good for you?" and we both smoked a cigarette together.
Last edited by picnaut; - 3rd August 2005 at 21:17.
At least MikroBasic has commands and libraries that support CAN Bus communications, something that is sadly lacking from the full price version of PBP that I recently purchased (and which may be available for sale again soon still sealed and unregistered) ..... doh !
Originally Posted by Melanie
this will add stronger spice flavours
The End......
Bookmarks