MCS+ with PBP 2.50


Closed Thread
Results 1 to 5 of 5
  1. #1

    Default MCS+ with PBP 2.50

    I just loaded my CD-ROM of PBP 2.50 and had a quick burrow in the manual.

    Big VAR LONG immediately fails. MCS+ does not recognise LONG as a keyword.

    I checked the MeLabs site (now showing PBP 2.50 available) and the Mecanique site but could not find any clues .

    How do I tell MCS+ 3.0.0.0 to use PBPL instead of PBPW?

    Cheers
    Brian

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Jul 2003
    Location
    Colorado Springs
    Posts
    4,959


    Did you find this post helpful? Yes | No

    Default

    Notice:
    This workaround is now obsolete. Please see post #4
    <hr>
    I've heard there will be an update to MCS that will make things easier.
    But I have not heard when that might be.

    So, in the mean time this is what I'm doing ...

    I have 2 folders PBPW and PBPL.
    PBPW is the original installation of 2.50
    PBPL was a copy of that folder.

    Then in the PBPL folder, the PBPL.EXE gets renamed to PBPW.EXE (delete or rename the existing PBPW.EXE first)

    Now, in MCS+ goto ...

    View | Compile and Program otions | Compiler tab | Find Manually Button

    And select the PBPL folder for Longs, or the PBPW folder for normal.

    hth,
    Last edited by Darrel Taylor; - 21st September 2007 at 05:42. Reason: OBSOLETE
    DT

  3. #3


    Did you find this post helpful? Yes | No

    Default Works a treat

    Thanks Darrel,
    That little workaround works a treat.

    It still needs a patch from Mecanique to make the reserved word capitalisation work however.

    Cheers
    Brian
    Last edited by BrianT; - 10th September 2007 at 06:21. Reason: Added info

  4. #4
    Join Date
    Jul 2003
    Location
    Colorado Springs
    Posts
    4,959


    Did you find this post helpful? Yes | No

    Default

    Once again I get to be the bearer of Good News.

    There's a new update to MicroCode Studio +. Version 3.0.0.5

    Now there's a Checkbox on the Compiler Options Tab that selects PBPL as the compiler. Or, un-check it for PBPW.



    Sure makes things easier.

    If the Checkbox is checked, the editor will also highlight the LONG variables.

    And a big one, the ICD works with signed 32-bit variables. &nbsp;

    Thanks to David Barker! http://www.mecanique.co.uk/

    It's an easy update. In MCS+, goto View | Online Updates
    <HR>Notice:
    If you've used the previous workaround from Post #2, then you should be able to just point to the original PBP 2.50 installation folder using the Find Manually button. The second folder is no longer needed.
    <br>
    DT

  5. #5
    Join Date
    Aug 2006
    Location
    Look, behind you.
    Posts
    2,818


    Did you find this post helpful? Yes | No

    Default easy

    This is how upgrades should be.
    Attached Images Attached Images  
    If you do not believe in MAGIC, Consider how currency has value simply by printing it, and is then traded for real assets.
    .
    Gold is the money of kings, silver is the money of gentlemen, barter is the money of peasants - but debt is the money of slaves
    .
    There simply is no "Happy Spam" If you do it you will disappear from this forum.

Similar Threads

  1. PBP 2.50 and Longs
    By mikendee in forum GPS
    Replies: 1
    Last Post: - 21st May 2008, 21:16
  2. PBP 2.50 UPGRADE problems!!!!
    By earltyso in forum mel PIC BASIC Pro
    Replies: 14
    Last Post: - 7th March 2008, 15:42
  3. PBP 2.50 manual
    By Fredrick in forum General
    Replies: 2
    Last Post: - 6th February 2008, 03:40
  4. Strange problem with PBP 2.50
    By Charles Linquis in forum mel PIC BASIC Pro
    Replies: 2
    Last Post: - 16th October 2007, 20:45
  5. New PBP 2.50?
    By Dave in forum mel PIC BASIC Pro
    Replies: 19
    Last Post: - 9th September 2007, 19:14

Members who have read this thread : 1

You do not have permission to view the list of names.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts