So many option but little understanding

Closed Thread
Results 1 to 16 of 16
  1. - 2nd April 2010, 19:11 #1
    PickyBiker's Avatar
    PickyBiker
    PickyBiker is offline Junior Member
    Join Date
    Mar 2010
    Location
    Austin, TX
    Posts
    68

    Default So many option but little understanding

    My PIC development system is currently made up of:
    Windows laptop (no serial port)
    PICBASIC PRO
    MPLAB IDE
    MACH X PIC Programer (USB to PC and has ICSP connector)

    I want to upgrade to in-circuit programming and in-circuit debuging but the options are overwhelming. I recently (1/1/10) retired and PIC programming of various gadgets is attractive to me, so I want a reasonably priced system of development with those cababilities.

    I see all kinds of options out there but have made some bad choices up to this point so I want to ask first this time.

    Can you please outline a few options so I can get off on the right direction?

    Thanks.
    PickyBiker says, "Riding a motorcycle eases programming frustration".
  2. - 2nd April 2010, 19:20 #2
    mackrackit's Avatar
    mackrackit
    mackrackit is offline SuperMod
    Join Date
    Nov 2003
    Location
    Wellton, U.S.A.
    Posts
    5,924

    Did you find this post helpful? Yes | No

    Default

    Personally I like the PicKit2.
    http://www.microchipdirect.com/produ...words=PG164120
    http://www.microchip.com/stellent/id...irects=pickit2
    Dave
    Always wear safety glasses while programming.
  3. - 2nd April 2010, 19:33 #3
    PickyBiker's Avatar
    PickyBiker
    PickyBiker is offline Junior Member
    Join Date
    Mar 2010
    Location
    Austin, TX
    Posts
    68

    Did you find this post helpful? Yes | No

    Default

    Thanks Mackrackit, but why not the Pickit 3?
    PickyBiker says, "Riding a motorcycle eases programming frustration".
  4. - 2nd April 2010, 19:54 #4
    mackrackit's Avatar
    mackrackit
    mackrackit is offline SuperMod
    Join Date
    Nov 2003
    Location
    Wellton, U.S.A.
    Posts
    5,924

    Did you find this post helpful? Yes | No

    Default

    I am not sure the 3 is worth the extra money.
    The 2, as far as I know will do everything and more than PBP. Plus it has a Serial and and other built in tools.

    I am sure the 3 is good, I have four programers from Micro Chip and they all work fine.
    Dave
    Always wear safety glasses while programming.
  5. - 2nd April 2010, 20:14 #5
    rmteo's Avatar
    rmteo
    rmteo is offline Senior Member
    Join Date
    May 2007
    Posts
    604

    Did you find this post helpful? Yes | No

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by mackrackit View Post
    Personally I like the PicKit2.
    How do you like the in-circuit debugging features of the PicKit2?
  6. - 2nd April 2010, 20:25 #6
    mackrackit's Avatar
    mackrackit
    mackrackit is offline SuperMod
    Join Date
    Nov 2003
    Location
    Wellton, U.S.A.
    Posts
    5,924

    Did you find this post helpful? Yes | No

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by rmteo View Post
    How do you like the in-circuit debugging features of the PicKit2?
    Embarrassed to say that I have not used that feature.
    What do you think about it?
    Dave
    Always wear safety glasses while programming.
  7. - 2nd April 2010, 20:43 #7
    rmteo's Avatar
    rmteo
    rmteo is offline Senior Member
    Join Date
    May 2007
    Posts
    604

    Did you find this post helpful? Yes | No

    Default

    I checked out the PicKit2's debugging capabilities using MPLAB (not sure if there is a way to do it without MPLAB) and I am not impressed. Not so much with the PicKit2 (it is an excellent device programmer, as good as, if not better than anything else on the market - especially considering its price) but with MPLAB. What a mess compared to some of the other development platforms that I use.
  8. - 2nd April 2010, 21:16 #8
    mackrackit's Avatar
    mackrackit
    mackrackit is offline SuperMod
    Join Date
    Nov 2003
    Location
    Wellton, U.S.A.
    Posts
    5,924

    Did you find this post helpful? Yes | No

    Default

    At one time I was a fan of MPLAB, now I only use it to read HEX files when someone has a problem.

    MCS is OK for quick and dirty stuff, IMHO.

    Development platform.. When I am working on a "complicated" project I do it on a Linux box using gedit and BAT files to invoke PBP/MPASM.

    But back to the question about programmers. I use the PicKit2 on all platforms.
    Dave
    Always wear safety glasses while programming.
  9. - 2nd April 2010, 21:40 #9
    rmteo's Avatar
    rmteo
    rmteo is offline Senior Member
    Join Date
    May 2007
    Posts
    604

    Did you find this post helpful? Yes | No

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by PickyBiker View Post
    I want to upgrade to in-circuit programming and in-circuit debuging but the options are overwhelming. I recently (1/1/10) retired and PIC programming of various gadgets is attractive to me, so I want a reasonably priced system of development with those cababilities.
    Perhaps someone else has a solution that meets PickyBiker's requirements.
  10. - 2nd April 2010, 22:56 #10
    malc-c's Avatar
    malc-c Guest

    Did you find this post helpful? Yes | No

    Default

    Not sure what your budget is but you might want to consider the EasyPIC6 board



    OK at £116 inc VAT it is more costly than the Pickit but I personally feel it is more cost effective in the long run as you have all the development items in one board and there is very little breadboarding. The board supports ICD, but I've never tried it with PBP /MCS
  11. - 2nd April 2010, 23:13 #11
    PickyBiker's Avatar
    PickyBiker
    PickyBiker is offline Junior Member
    Join Date
    Mar 2010
    Location
    Austin, TX
    Posts
    68

    Did you find this post helpful? Yes | No

    Default

    Well a PICkit 2 is on the way. Next time I get a little in-rush of funds... an EasyPIC6 might be hard to resist. Looks like it would be just a hoot to play with all by itself. Love the idea of led's for each pic line and the LCD.

    So many tools... So little time.
    PickyBiker says, "Riding a motorcycle eases programming frustration".
  12. - 3rd April 2010, 14:25 #12
    rmteo's Avatar
    rmteo
    rmteo is offline Senior Member
    Join Date
    May 2007
    Posts
    604

    Did you find this post helpful? Yes | No

    Default

    I have an EasyPIC4 development board with the add-on 4x4 matrix keypad, SD/MMC card and RTC board that I no longer use (no GLCD). 70GBP plus shipping for the lot - let me know if you are interested.
    Attached Images Attached Images  
  13. - 3rd April 2010, 19:48 #13
    Acetronics2's Avatar
    Acetronics2
    Acetronics2 is offline Fanatical Contributor
    Join Date
    May 2004
    Location
    NW France
    Posts
    3,614

    Did you find this post helpful? Yes | No

    Wink

    One more vote for Easy Pic 6 ... and its bunch of modules.

    I use an easy Pic 5 for a while and MPLAB ICD features are missing ... EP6 has it, now !

    Alain
    ************************************************** ***********************
    Why insist on using 32 Bits when you're not even able to deal with the first 8 ones ??? ehhhhhh ...
    ************************************************** ***********************
    IF there is the word "Problem" in your question ...
    certainly the answer is " RTFM " or " RTFDataSheet " !!!
    *****************************************
  14. - 4th April 2010, 03:42 #14
    PickyBiker's Avatar
    PickyBiker
    PickyBiker is offline Junior Member
    Join Date
    Mar 2010
    Location
    Austin, TX
    Posts
    68

    Did you find this post helpful? Yes | No

    Default

    Alain, yes, there is an EP6 on my wish list. The next in-rush of funds will be when the Social Security check comes in. That'll be in about 2 and a half weeks.
    PickyBiker says, "Riding a motorcycle eases programming frustration".
  15. - 23rd April 2010, 05:23 #15
    PickyBiker's Avatar
    PickyBiker
    PickyBiker is offline Junior Member
    Join Date
    Mar 2010
    Location
    Austin, TX
    Posts
    68

    Did you find this post helpful? Yes | No

    Default My EasyPic6 just arrived

    This looks like a great development board. One question, how well can it be integrated into my development environment, MPLAB IDE & PICBASIC Pro? The first thing I would like to do is make it the "programmer" in that environment, or course then I would want to use the built-in ICD or at least connect an ICD to it. Any chance of that happening? If not, would you just create the .hex file and use the supplied flash proogram to get it into the PIC? Not the cleanest method, but it should work.
    PickyBiker says, "Riding a motorcycle eases programming frustration".
  16. - 23rd April 2010, 09:45 #16
    malc-c's Avatar
    malc-c Guest

    Did you find this post helpful? Yes | No

    Default Mcs

    Glad to hear your new toy has arrived

    Personally I use Microcode Studio for the IDE with my EasyPIC 5 board. It is quick to set up as it can find both the PBP exe and MPASM and the picFlash exe files automatically. I'm not sure how MCS works with the ICD option available on the EasyPIC 6 board though, maybe Alain can help out on that score.

    For me, I like MCS. Make a change to the code, click compile and program and job done. Testing further changes is quicker as you already have the PicFLASH application open, so just click reload and click write after re-compiling.
« Previous Thread | Next Thread »

Members who have read this thread : 1

You do not have permission to view the list of names.

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts

Forum Rules