How come they make electronics hard as poss


Closed Thread
Results 1 to 10 of 10
  1. #1
    Join Date
    Oct 2005
    Location
    New Zealand
    Posts
    171

    Default How come they make electronics hard as poss

    Just wondering if anyone can enlighten me as to why they make white LEDs reverse polarity to standard LEDs? I can't think of any reason other than to make it awkward for the hobbist. I mean where's the logic in it? Also why not make CBE in transistors standard and while they are at it make the 78XX regulators have the same pinouts for the 100ma and 1A units

    Ahhh feels much better now I have that out my monday morning rant.

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Sep 2004
    Location
    montreal, canada
    Posts
    6,898


    Did you find this post helpful? Yes | No

    Default

    The universal answer is... BECAUSE!
    Steve

    It's not a bug, it's a random feature.
    There's no problem, only learning opportunities.

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Feb 2003
    Posts
    432


    Did you find this post helpful? Yes | No

    Default

    Why do cars not have a standard layout for the controls.

    My two cars have the indicator stalks and windshield wiper stalks the opposite way round. When I use the wifes car I usually wipe the windshield instead of signalling my intention to turn !!!!

    Thankfully there does seem to be a standard layout to the foot controls !!!!

    But I do understand your frustration.

    Was looking at some RGB LEDS on a website today and the pinout was differnet for Common Anode and Common Cathode.

    Green
    Blue
    CommonCathode
    Red


    Green
    Blue
    Red
    CommonAnode
    Keith

    www.diyha.co.uk
    www.kat5.tv

  4. #4
    T.Jackson's Avatar
    T.Jackson Guest


    Did you find this post helpful? Yes | No

    Post

    Quote Originally Posted by George View Post
    Just wondering if anyone can enlighten me as to why they make white LEDs reverse polarity to standard LEDs? I can't think of any reason other than to make it awkward for the hobbist. I mean where's the logic in it? Also why not make CBE in transistors standard and while they are at it make the 78XX regulators have the same pinouts for the 100ma and 1A units

    Ahhh feels much better now I have that out my monday morning rant.
    That's a very good point. It's not like they couldn't standardize pin configurations. The actual chip is usually no bigger than the size of a head on a matchstick. (Freaky) Case size is normally dominated by the number of pins required. I guess also to, to some extent - thermal dissipation can denote size.

  5. #5
    Join Date
    Feb 2003
    Posts
    432


    Did you find this post helpful? Yes | No

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by T.Jackson View Post
    That's a very good point. It's not like they couldn't standardize pin configurations.
    But some devices, particularly transistors are available in several pinouts for what is electrically the same device.

    BC182/BC182L (NPN) and its complimentary device BC212/BC212L (PNP) are in TO92 packages but with different pinouts.

    The non "L" version is TO92-4 EBC
    The "L" version is TO92-1 BCE
    Keith

    www.diyha.co.uk
    www.kat5.tv

  6. #6
    Join Date
    Feb 2003
    Posts
    432


    Did you find this post helpful? Yes | No

    Default

    Thinking about it a bit more....

    Why are 78xx regulators IN-GND-OUT whereas 79xx regulators are GND-IN-OUT
    Keith

    www.diyha.co.uk
    www.kat5.tv

  7. #7
    T.Jackson's Avatar
    T.Jackson Guest


    Did you find this post helpful? Yes | No

    Default

    Apart from possible intentions of helping to simplify PCB layout - it all makes no sense.

  8. #8
    Join Date
    Sep 2004
    Location
    montreal, canada
    Posts
    6,898


    Did you find this post helpful? Yes | No

    Default

    well, if the tab was GND, then it would simplify the board layout. I'm guessing more about an internal structure rather than this... but everyone may have it's own assumption... only the original designer would probably know...

    thinking about reference in a dual rail supply... you could discover why they do it like that... is 79xxx really a 79xx or a 78xxx relabelled ??? i didn't compare their internal schematic.

    if everything would be standard, it would remove all fun...
    Last edited by mister_e; - 15th May 2007 at 03:50.
    Steve

    It's not a bug, it's a random feature.
    There's no problem, only learning opportunities.

  9. #9
    T.Jackson's Avatar
    T.Jackson Guest


    Did you find this post helpful? Yes | No

    Post

    I don't think the internals force restrictions on anything. It's about the size of a head on a matchstick in most cases. But hey, I don't work in Silicon Valley, so I place no bets on anything.

  10. #10
    Join Date
    Aug 2006
    Location
    Omaha, Nebraska USA
    Posts
    263


    Did you find this post helpful? Yes | No

    Default

    Believe it or not, this same complaint surfaced many years before transistors and integrated circuits!

    The issue (this was back when the Earth's crust was still cooling) was why can't the same kinds of vacuum tubes (i.e., diode, dual diode, triode, etc.) have the same pinout?

    In those days (there was no Silicon Valley and you could still afford to buy a house in California), the issue had to do, always first and foremost, with both the electrical characteristics of the device and good engineering practice.

    And, in the end, the same thing occurred--two vacuum tubes, identical or nearly so, would have different pinouts.
    Last edited by RussMartin; - 14th July 2007 at 06:20.
    Russ
    N0EVC, xWB6ONT, xWN6ONT

    "Easy to use" is easy to say.

Similar Threads

  1. The Future Of Hobby Electronics.
    By T.Jackson in forum Off Topic
    Replies: 53
    Last Post: - 2nd February 2009, 07:39
  2. Change On Interrupt, PIC16F884
    By elec_mech in forum mel PIC BASIC Pro
    Replies: 17
    Last Post: - 14th November 2008, 18:25
  3. PBP is driving me crazy trying to make an 18F chip blink
    By George in forum mel PIC BASIC Pro
    Replies: 5
    Last Post: - 20th June 2008, 07:08
  4. In Tribute of Electronics Australia
    By T.Jackson in forum Off Topic
    Replies: 1
    Last Post: - 28th May 2008, 08:43
  5. Replies: 3
    Last Post: - 10th April 2008, 11:02

Members who have read this thread : 0

You do not have permission to view the list of names.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts