Proton PICBASIC vs MeLabs PICBASIC

[Fredrick]

Proton PICBASIC vs MeLabs PICBASIC what´s the diffrent`s?

Great forum btw.

[skimask]

Proton PICBASIC vs MeLabs PICBASIC what´s the diffrent`s?

Great forum btw.

Person 1 - PicBasicPro is the BEST!

Person 2 - No...Proton Rocks!

Person 1 - No...PicBasicPro is best!

and so on and so on...

Person 3 - Person's 1 and 2 are both wrong!!!

Get the datasheets/instruction manuals for both of them. Read them. Figure out what you want to accomplish. You might end up going with free assembly, or maybe even C, or something else entirely.
Personally, I've only used PicBasicPro. I like it and like it a lot.
I'm sure there's nothing wrong with Proton Basic, and if I'd have bought Proton instead of PicBasicPro, the argument would be the other way around in reverse upside down.

[Fredrick]

Ok thanx.
It´s like PC or MAC then...

So both Proton and MeLabs PICBASIC can do the same job! ?

[mister_e]

yup, both WILL do the same job, the power is back to the keyboard, not in your hard drive...

There's a lot of thread about that here, do a little search within the forum.

[Darrel Taylor]

I too have never used Proton before.

And all I can say is that there was a group of people here that used to be pretty good with PBP, who suddenly switched to Proton.
You'll now find those same people over at the Swordfish forum.

I would not recommend Swordfish for beginning programmers.

But if you're proficient in a language like Delphi (pascal), Javascript, or other "Highly Structured" languages, you might find Swordfish easier to work with.

_

[mister_e]

Down side... for 18F only

[tenaja]

I own both, and for the most part, I agree with the above comments. There are some significant differences worth noting.

PicBasic Pro (PBP) was designed to be a PIC alternative to Basic Stamp 2's. It's very good at that, and its code runs much faster than stamps. It is very easy for beginners to transition to PIC's from Stamps. I've made some good code with it. You pay for version updates.

Proton+ Development Suite (PDS) was designed to be a good PIC compiler, with many commands being Stamp compatible. (They've also added some similar commands that are optimized for your specific use, instead of a "catch-all" command.) PDS has a broader command range, and compiles code much smaller and runs faster than PBP. (My PBP code converted to PDS was about 20% smaller!) The current Beta version, which is available to all licensed users, has many new powerful features, like automatic variable saving for interrupts. (This makes a few of Daryl's add-in code obsolete.) There are three levels of optimization for even more compact code, that can save up to another 15%. For 18F's, both high level and low level interrupts are supported. Plus, you get a development board simulator to test your code in. PDS has a macro capability to make your own commands, and call them with parameters, just like any other basic command. I'm one of those who "switched", and most of what I do is now PDS.

Both forums have excellent support.

And yes, Swordfish looks neat, but it's only 18F's. I'm sure that will change, eventually, but probably towards more advanced PIC's. It's "structured", but that really only has a benefit if you are writing huge code (which 16F's and smaller can't handle). In reality, you can write structured code in PBP or PDS, too; it just looks slightly different.

[tenaja]

For those who don't know, Swordfish was written by the same guy who wrote MicroCode Studio (PBP IDE) and also the IDE for Proton.