Bit Angle Modulation (BAM) in a PIC


Closed Thread
Results 1 to 40 of 151

Hybrid View

  1. #1
    Join Date
    Aug 2009
    Posts
    16


    Did you find this post helpful? Yes | No

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by lanyong View Post
    because u can share ur code.

    so i say the secret,haha.

    we can get A[0],A[1],,,A[13].

    then

    move A[1] to W.

    then

    movff A[0], PORTA
    movwf PORTA

    then we changer the H/L in a cycle.

    have a good time.

    haha.
    Yep=)))
    It's something like that.


    btw, i had got my first shocks from electronics when i tryed to understand how my photoflash works. There was ~1000V on capacitor after trafo, but it didn't scare me) i was 5 years old then)

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Mar 2009
    Posts
    19


    Did you find this post helpful? Yes | No

    Default photoflash

    Quote Originally Posted by sanch0 View Post
    Yep=)))
    It's something like that.


    btw, i had got my first shocks from electronics mosquitowhen i tryed to understand how my photoflash works. There was ~1000V on capacitor after trafo, but it didn't scare me) i was 5 years old then)

    but it is a secret for me.

    we can use the 1000v to electronic mosquito,

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Aug 2005
    Location
    Michigan, USA
    Posts
    224


    Did you find this post helpful? Yes | No

    Default

    Darrel,

    I think these Gentlemen may be having a little fun at your expense as they try to get a rise out of you (LOL). That's the only reason I can think of for avoiding a simple question and for becoming a bit offensive when challenged.

    My precalculated "output table" or "toggle table" MIBAM method should work fine with 13 or 14 bit duty cycle values but as you've already determined I can only get refresh rates of 610-Hz (8-chan, 13-bit, 200-nsec step) or 305-Hz (16-chan, 13-bit, 400-nsec step), etc., when using an 18F' device and 40-MHz clock (Tcy = 100-nsec). ISR "overhead" would be about 77% for the example below but could be improved with some structural changes.

    Take care. Kind regards, Mike


    Code:
    ;
    ;  8-chan (port b), 13-bit, 200-nsec (1638.4-usec period), 610-Hz
    ;
    v_isr_h
            movff   bdat+12,LATB    ; b12 data        (2048T)
            inDlyCy(2048*tStep-2)   ; half 2^12
            movff   bdat+11,LATB    ; b11 data        (1024T)
            inDlyCy(1024*tStep-2)   ; half 2^11
            movff   bdat+10,LATB    ; b10 data        (512T)
            inDlyCy(512*tStep-2)    ; half 2^10
            movff   bdat+09,LATB    ; b9 data         (256T)
            inDlyCy(256*tStep-2)    ; half 2^9
            movff   bdat+08,LATB    ; b8 data         (128T)
            inDlyCy(128*tStep-2)    ; half 2^8
            movff   bdat+07,LATB    ; b7 data         (64T)
            inDlyCy(64*tStep-2)     ; half 2^7
            movff   bdat+06,LATB    ; b6 data         (32T)
            inDlyCy(32*tStep-2)     ; half 2^6
            movff   bdat+05,LATB    ; b5 data         (16T)
            inDlyCy(16*tStep-2)     ; half 2^5
            movff   bdat+04,LATB    ; b4 data         (8T)
            inDlyCy(8*tStep-2)      ; half 2^4
            movff   bdat+03,LATB    ; b3 data         (4T)
            inDlyCy(4*tStep-2)      ; half 2^3
            movff   bdat+02,LATB    ; b2 data         (2T)
            inDlyCy(2*tStep-2)      ; half 2^2
            movff   bdat+01,LATB    ; b1 data         (1T)
            inDlyCy(1*tStep-2)      ; half 2^1 (0 delay)
            movff   bdat+00,LATB    ; b0 data         (1T)
            inDlyCy(1*tStep-2)      ; full 2^0 (0 delay)
            movff   bdat+01,LATB    ; b1 data         (1T)
            inDlyCy(1*tStep-2)      ; half 2^1 (0 delay)
            movff   bdat+02,LATB    ; b2 data         (2T)
            inDlyCy(2*tStep-2)      ; half 2^2
            movff   bdat+03,LATB    ; b3 data         (4T)
            inDlyCy(4*tStep-2)      ; half 2^3
            movff   bdat+04,LATB    ; b4 data         (8T)
            inDlyCy(8*tStep-2)      ; half 2^4
            movff   bdat+05,LATB    ; b5 data         (16T)
            inDlyCy(16*tStep-2)     ; half 2^5
            movff   bdat+06,LATB    ; b6 data         (32T)
            inDlyCy(32*tStep-2)     ; half 2^6
            movff   bdat+07,LATB    ; b7 data         (64T)
            inDlyCy(64*tStep-2)     ; half 2^7
            movff   bdat+08,LATB    ; b8 data         (128T)
            inDlyCy(128*tStep-2)    ; half 2^8
            movff   bdat+09,LATB    ; b9 data         (256T)
            inDlyCy(256*tStep-2)    ; half 2^9
            movff   bdat+10,LATB    ; b10 data        (512T)
            inDlyCy(512*tStep-2)    ; half 2^10
            movff   bdat+11,LATB    ; b11 data        (1024T)
            inDlyCy(1024*tStep-802) ; half 2^11
            rcall   prep            ; rebuild bdat array
            movff   btmp,LATB       ; b12 data        (2048T)
            retfie  FAST            ;
    ;
    Last edited by Mike, K8LH; - 22nd August 2009 at 15:45.

  4. #4
    Join Date
    Jul 2003
    Location
    Colorado Springs
    Posts
    4,959


    Did you find this post helpful? Yes | No

    Default

    Thanks for the Backup Mike.
    It's nice to see somebody else gets the same numbers.

    I'm making some progress with the "full-port" modification to MIBAM.

    Actually doing the outputs is easy, just like you showed previously.
    But I'm still having problems letting the user assign pins at random.

    It's getting there, although a bit slower than anticipated.
    <br>
    DT

  5. #5
    Join Date
    Aug 2009
    Posts
    16


    Did you find this post helpful? Yes | No

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Darrel Taylor View Post
    Thanks for the Backup Mike.
    It's nice to see somebody else gets the same numbers.

    I'm making some progress with the "full-port" modification to MIBAM.

    Actually doing the outputs is easy, just like you showed previously.
    But I'm still having problems letting the user assign pins at random.

    It's getting there, although a bit slower than anticipated.
    <br>
    that's nice, but not so effective at all. interleaving could be used to get more channels at the same freq. and something else to get 100ns discretization.)))

  6. #6
    Join Date
    Feb 2008
    Location
    Michigan, USA
    Posts
    231


    Did you find this post helpful? Yes | No

    Default LP INTS with MIBAM

    Hi all,
    I had a question that seems to have gotten lost in the fray....

    I'm trying to use other interrupts in hardware functions while using MIBAM.
    Specifically, a CCP HI/LO capture or USUART. the stand alone MIBAM examples work wonderfully, but when I try and incorporate a lo priority pulse capture or do comm, I run into problems. Is there a way to use incorporate the other ints and still use MIBAM? I have resorted to using a second PIC, but that isn't very elegant.

    Thanks for thinking about it.
    Bo

  7. #7
    Join Date
    Jul 2003
    Location
    Colorado Springs
    Posts
    4,959


    Did you find this post helpful? Yes | No

    Default

    Hi Bo,

    If you're using an 18F, then sure ... you can have Low Priority interrupts running too. But I don't think you need interrupts for that stuff.

    With MIBAM ... <strike>99.4%</strike> 94% of the processor time is un-used. It's just sitting around twiddling it's thumbs. (if it has any)

    And since "capture's" retain the captured value for a while, they can easily be handled in the main loop by polling the CCPIF flag.

    I've also run the USART at 250kbaud for DMX reception, again strictly polled in the main loop, while MIBAM runs in the background.

    So much time ... so few things to do ... if only life were like that.
    <br>
    DT

  8. #8
    Join Date
    Feb 2012
    Posts
    64


    Did you find this post helpful? Yes | No

    Default Re: Bit Angle Modulation (BAM) in a PIC

    I notice this is an old thread (Starting in 2009 with the last post in 2011). I downloaded Darrel Taylor's BIBAM ver 1.1 and had it working great with a 16f690.
    I am now trying it on a 18f14k22 and I can't get it working at all. From what I am reading it should work with the 18F's. I am trying to control 9 outputs (3 RGB LEDs). The 16f690 is too slow @8MHz

    Does anyone know if there are any issues using this with the 18f14k22 or if there is an updated BIBAM available?
    I am getting assembly errors when I try to compile: Symbol not previously defines (_VarIn), Missing arguments.

    Jim

  9. #9
    Join Date
    Jul 2003
    Location
    Colorado Springs
    Posts
    4,959


    Did you find this post helpful? Yes | No

    Default Re: Bit Angle Modulation (BAM) in a PIC

    Hi Jim,

    It should work with the 14K22.

    That error can only be generated by a BAM_PIN statement.

    Make sure it looks something like this ...

    BAM_PIN (PORTB,0, Duty1)

    Note the comma between PORTB and 0.
    Duty1 should be a BYTE var.

    Make sure the designated pins are available.
    The 14K22 only has RA0-RA5, RB4-RB7 and RC0-RC7
    DT

Similar Threads

  1. decoding quadrature encoders
    By ice in forum mel PIC BASIC Pro
    Replies: 93
    Last Post: - 28th February 2017, 09:02
  2. Cordic trig assembly code for PIC18f
    By ScaleRobotics in forum mel PIC BASIC Pro
    Replies: 54
    Last Post: - 8th September 2015, 05:36
  3. AT/PS2 Keybord - PIC Interface?
    By Kamikaze47 in forum Code Examples
    Replies: 73
    Last Post: - 9th August 2009, 16:10
  4. MIBAM - (Mirror Imaged Bit Angle Modulation)
    By Darrel Taylor in forum Code Examples
    Replies: 2
    Last Post: - 15th February 2009, 16:02
  5. Bit Angle Modulation
    By BH_epuk in forum mel PIC BASIC Pro
    Replies: 1
    Last Post: - 18th November 2008, 07:01

Members who have read this thread : 1

You do not have permission to view the list of names.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts