To be honnest i never use PM, so i don't understand when you say
I tend to have more bugs when I use MPASM on anything else but the 18Fxxx chips....
If you don't use any assembler lines/macro/feature/etc etc there's no real advantage between PM/MPASM. MPASM should compile as fast as PM, but it load that little GUI... hence why it may appear to be a bit more slow.
You can still open PM.TXT and MPASM PDF and compare both features.
PM and MPASM syntax are a bit different, so why using 2 syntax when only one is more powerfull anyway. But again, if you just use PBP syntax/command set, it doesn't make any difference... or just in the CONFIG fuse syntax... big deal.
mmm... sure i still forgot something...
Steve
It's not a bug, it's a random feature.
There's no problem, only learning opportunities.
Bookmarks