Transmission works with wires but not always with wireless


Closed Thread
Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 40 of 43
  1. #1
    Join Date
    Apr 2007
    Posts
    9

    Default Transmission works with wires but not always with wireless

    I am using the Laipac 315 MHz RF modules and I serout only once and it works with wires 100% of the time. When I try wireless it works once in a while. On the other hand, when I serout 5 times the wireless works most of the time but does not work once in a while. I have added 4 $55s for a preamble and manchester encoded everything.
    Last edited by jyi1; - 24th April 2007 at 05:59.

  2. #2
    skimask's Avatar
    skimask Guest


    Did you find this post helpful? Yes | No

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by jyi1 View Post
    I am using the Laipac 315 modules and I serout only once and it works with wires 100% of the time. When I try wireless it works once in a while. On the other hand, when I serout 5 times the wireless works most of the time but does not work once in a while. I have add 4 $55 for a preamble and manchester encoded everything.
    But yet we don't see any code to base an opinion on what could possibly be wrong!

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Jul 2003
    Location
    Colorado Springs
    Posts
    4,959


    Did you find this post helpful? Yes | No

    Default

    skimask,

    Not all solutions require the persons code to solve the problem.

    If you've used a "Laipac 315" before, then maybe you've noticed something that might apply.

    He's made a very specific request, and shouldn't expect an answer for quite some time. Hopefully from someone that's tried that device before.

    You're indignant response only 1 minute after his post, does not help.
    <br>
    DT

  4. #4
    Join Date
    Apr 2007
    Posts
    9


    Did you find this post helpful? Yes | No

    Default

    Transceiver

    Include "Modedefs.bas"

    ct55 var byte: encoded1 var byte: p var byte: counter var byte: e var byte: action var byte:
    encoded var byte: encoded2 var byte: action2 var byte: B0 var bit: B1 var bit: B0=1: B1=0:
    p=0: e=0: encoded1=0: counter = 0: action=0: action2=0: encoded=0: encoded2=0:

    Main:

    Clr:
    p=0: e=0: encoded1=0: action=0: action2=0: encoded=0: encoded2=0

    Maina:
    ct55=0 'counter for $55 is zero

    Wait55:
    serin PORTB.0, n2400, encoded1
    If encoded1 = $55 Then
    ct55 = ct55 + 1
    If ct55 = 4 Then goto Waitaa
    Else
    goto Maina
    Endif
    goto Wait55

    Waitaa:
    serin PORTB.0, n2400, encoded1
    If encoded1 <> $aa Then goto Maina
    serin PORTB.0, n2400, encoded1
    write 0, encoded1

    For counter = 0 to 3 : p.0[counter] = encoded1.0[counter*2]:Next counter
    write 1,p

    e = p:
    If ((e.3=B0) and (e.2=B1)) Then
    goto L3
    Else
    write 2, p
    goto Clr
    Endif

    L3:
    If((p.1=0) and (p.0=0)) Then
    action=%1010
    write 3, p
    For counter = 0 to 3
    If action.0[counter]=0 Then
    encoded.0[counter*2]=0 : encoded.0[counter*2+1]=1
    Else
    encoded.0[counter*2]=1 : encoded.0[counter*2+1]=0
    Endif
    Next counter:
    write 8, encoded
    For counter = 0 to 4
    serout PORTB.7, n2400, [$55,$55,$55,$55,$aa, encoded]
    Next counter
    goto Clr


    Endif

    If ((p.1=0) and (p.0=1)) Then
    action2 = %1011
    write 4, p
    For counter = 0 to 3
    If action2.0[counter]=0 Then
    encoded2.0[counter*2] = 0: encoded2.0[counter*2+1] = 1
    Else
    encoded2.0[counter*2] = 1: encoded2.0[counter*2+1] = 0
    Endif
    Next counter:
    write 9, encoded2
    For counter = 0 to 4
    serout PORTB.7, n2400, [$55,$55, $55, $55,$aa, encoded2]
    Next counter
    goto Clr

    Endif
    End

    Receiver

    Include "Modedefs.bas"
    cot55 var byte: encoded1 var byte: p var byte: counter var byte: e var byte:
    p = 0: e = 0: encoded1 = 0: counter = 0:

    Main:


    Mainb:
    cot55=0 'counter for $55 is zero

    Wait55:
    serin PORTB.0, n2400, encoded1
    If encoded1 = $55 Then cot55 = cot55 + 1
    If cot55 = 4 Then
    goto Waitaa
    Else
    goto Wait55
    Endif
    'goto Wait55

    Waitaa:
    serin PORTB.0, n2400, encoded1
    If encoded1 <> $aa Then goto Maina
    serin PORTB.0, n2400, encoded1
    write 0, encoded1

    For counter = 0 to 3 : p.0[counter] = encoded1.0[counter*2]: Next counter
    write 1,p

    If (p.1=1) Then
    goto B4
    Else
    write 2,p
    High 2
    Pause 1000
    Low 2
    goto Mainb
    Endif

    B4:
    e = p
    write 3, e
    High 1
    Pause 1000
    Low 1
    High 5
    serout PORTB.3, n2400, [e.3]
    serout PORTB.4, n2400, [e.2]
    goto Mainb

    End
    Last edited by jyi1; - 24th April 2007 at 05:46.

  5. #5
    Join Date
    Nov 2005
    Location
    Bombay, India
    Posts
    947


    Did you find this post helpful? Yes | No

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by jyi1 View Post
    I am using the Laipac 315 MHz RF modules and I serout only once and it works with wires 100% of the time. When I try wireless it works once in a while. On the other hand, when I serout 5 times the wireless works most of the time but does not work once in a while. I have added 4 $55s for a preamble and manchester encoded everything.
    JYI1:

    Firstly, I feel a name is more suited to talking in a forum. Anyway, after seeing your code, I do feel you can look for the 55,aa alone as the marker to your data. You may not see the 4x55s followed by the aa considering that the Laipac receiver module is ASK(correct me if I am wrong).

    I have used similar modules with PIC and implemented a wireless joystick which works like you say almost 100% of the time. There is an occasional hiccup due to which I would not get 100%. To achieve this, I know that RF shielding of the receiver is priority #1. I did not Manchester code my data, that could be the reason for the almost 100% accuracy. Also, the modules I have used (Summitek) specify the data rate in the region of almost 1200 baud and not 2400 baud as you use. Perhaps you need to look into this as well.

    Jerson

  6. #6
    Join Date
    Apr 2007
    Posts
    9


    Did you find this post helpful? Yes | No

    Default

    Yes Laipac uses ASK and has 2400 bps. I do not understand why the $55,$55,$55,$55,$aa is not always picked up by the receiver when I send it once. It seems like I need to send it the same thing 5 times for it to pick up reasonably well.

  7. #7
    Join Date
    Nov 2005
    Location
    Bombay, India
    Posts
    947


    Did you find this post helpful? Yes | No

    Default

    The module needs time to get above the noise floor before it can decode the $55 stream correctly. That is why I suggested to just look for the $55,$AA in your code; you still have to transmit the $55s before you send the $AA. Those should be considered as padding and ignored in the receiver. You may increase it beyond the 4 that you have now to improve performance if you will.

    Transmit $55,$55,$55,$55,$55,$AA,"data"
    Receive .................."ah there it is","data" You ignore the first 4x$55


    Jerson
    Last edited by Jerson; - 24th April 2007 at 06:56. Reason: <data> shows as blanks

  8. #8
    Join Date
    Apr 2007
    Posts
    9


    Did you find this post helpful? Yes | No

    Default

    So I should basically send a couple of $55 and then just wait for $55, $aa only?
    I'm thinking of coding it like: serin2 PORTB.0, 16780, [WAIT($55, $aa) ,encoded1], would this be good enough?

  9. #9
    Join Date
    Nov 2005
    Location
    Bombay, India
    Posts
    947


    Did you find this post helpful? Yes | No

    Default

    I think you got the point. Still, tell us your name. JYI1 sounds like a name from the new StarTrek series

    Jerson

  10. #10
    skimask's Avatar
    skimask Guest


    Did you find this post helpful? Yes | No

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Darrel Taylor View Post
    skimask, Not all solutions require the persons code to solve the problem. If you've used a "Laipac 315" before, then maybe you've noticed something that might apply. He's made a very specific request, and shouldn't expect an answer for quite some time. Hopefully from someone that's tried that device before. You're indignant response only 1 minute after his post, does not help. <br>
    True...but if the guy has the code in the first place, why not hasten the process and post it straight away!

    And tell me that this thread/code and this one
    http://www.picbasic.co.uk/forum/showthread.php?t=6145
    don't look very similar...too similar...not that there's anything wrong with that. I mean, at least the guy (whether it be the same guy as the other thread or actually a new guy) searched the forum's and found some usable code instead asking for somebody else to write it all.
    And no, I don't think everything is a conspiracy...or is it?

  11. #11
    Join Date
    Apr 2007
    Posts
    9


    Did you find this post helpful? Yes | No

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Jerson View Post
    I think you got the point. Still, tell us your name. JYI1 sounds like a name from the new StarTrek series

    Jerson
    I discover that even if I send $55 4, 6, 8, 10, 20 times but it still picks it up occasionally. On the other receiver end I am looking for $55, $aa.
    Last edited by jyi1; - 24th April 2007 at 19:04.

  12. #12
    Join Date
    Dec 2005
    Posts
    1,073


    Did you find this post helpful? Yes | No

    Default

    I have used these extensively (although I get mine direct from WenShing in Taiwan). These are superregenerative ASK receivers. They need a pronounced preamble in order to set the AGC and receive threshold. They work quite well at low data rates using a protocol like the NEC protocol (used by X10 for their wireless remotes) which I've detailed here...You might also benefit from reading this page...You need a fairly good balance between pulses and spaces (which Manchester encoding guarantees) but the fact that you need to send several copies in order to receive reliably indicates you need the initial copies to set the threshold and AGC.

    Which output pin are you using? Using the linear (analog) output can complicate things. It's usually best to use the digital output. A good receiving antenna is important. An eggbeater is easy to build and matches the 50-ohm input impedance of the receiver.You can capture the output(s) from the receiver using a soundcard as I show here...which can give you an idea of the quality of the signal as received.

    Bruce Reynolds sells the 433.92MHz version of this receiver. I believe he has some example projects with PBP code on his website.

    BTW, the fact that your code works with a hardwired connection is another indication that your problems are related to RF signal quality.

    Good luck.
    Last edited by dhouston; - 24th April 2007 at 20:36.

  13. #13
    Join Date
    Sep 2006
    Location
    Venezuela - Caracas
    Posts
    48


    Did you find this post helpful? Yes | No

    Default

    i had many bug with RF 433mhz
    try pause 5 to pause 50

    im my circuit pause 5 word perfect
    without pause not work for me

    my simple test

    Code:
       ...
    transmiter:
       for i =  1 to 30
          serout data_out, N2400, ["<", "A", "B", ">", i]
          PAUSE 5
       next i
    Code:
       ...
    receive:
       serin data_in, N2400, "<ABDC>", TIME_OUT, I
       if i=1 then .........
    
    TIME_OUT:
    goto receive
    Last edited by mpardinho; - 24th April 2007 at 20:47.

  14. #14
    Join Date
    Mar 2007
    Posts
    42


    Did you find this post helpful? Yes | No

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by mpardinho View Post
    i had many bug with RF 433mhz
    try pause 5 to pause 50

    im my circuit pause 5 word perfect
    without pause not work for me

    my simple test

    Code:
       ...
    transmiter:
       for i =  1 to 30
          serout data_out, N2400, ["<", "A", "B", ">", i]
          PAUSE 5
       next i
    Code:
       ...
    receive:
       serin data_in, N2400, "<ABDC>", TIME_OUT, I
       if i=1 then .........
    
    TIME_OUT:
    goto receive
    The pause helps if I need to send the data more than once. But when I only send it once it doesn't help

  15. #15
    Join Date
    Mar 2007
    Posts
    42


    Did you find this post helpful? Yes | No

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by dhouston View Post
    I have used these extensively (although I get mine direct from WenShing in Taiwan). These are superregenerative ASK receivers. They need a pronounced preamble in order to set the AGC and receive threshold. They work quite well at low data rates using a protocol like the NEC protocol (used by X10 for their wireless remotes) which I've detailed here...You might also benefit from reading this page...You need a fairly good balance between pulses and spaces (which Manchester encoding guarantees) but the fact that you need to send several copies in order to receive reliably indicates you need the initial copies to set the threshold and AGC.

    Which output pin are you using? Using the linear (analog) output can complicate things. It's usually best to use the digital output. A good receiving antenna is important. An eggbeater is easy to build and matches the 50-ohm input impedance of the receiver.You can capture the output(s) from the receiver using a soundcard as I show here...which can give you an idea of the quality of the signal as received.

    Bruce Reynolds sells the 433.92MHz version of this receiver. I believe he has some example projects with PBP code on his website.

    BTW, the fact that your code works with a hardwired connection is another indication that your problems are related to RF signal quality.

    Good luck.
    I am using the digital data output pin. Also, since I need to send my data 5 times and with a pause of 5 does it mean that I should make my preamble longer?

  16. #16
    Join Date
    Sep 2004
    Location
    montreal, canada
    Posts
    6,898


    Did you find this post helpful? Yes | No

    Default

    Serial communication is a female thing, so bear in mind that preamble are needed and some of them may say the size don't make any difference
    ---------------------------------------------------------
    Usually 3-5 $AA as preamble is enough. Machester encoding have it's own advantage if you send long data packet. A checksum is also handy.

    I don't think the character pacing (pause x) is really needed if you're using a slow baudrate (2400 bauds or so)

    a single SEROUT/DEBUG/SEROUT2/HSEROUT line is all you need in many case.

    Always make sure your crystal are accurate.

    BTW which PIC are you using?
    Last edited by mister_e; - 24th April 2007 at 22:49.
    Steve

    It's not a bug, it's a random feature.
    There's no problem, only learning opportunities.

  17. #17
    Join Date
    Mar 2007
    Posts
    42


    Did you find this post helpful? Yes | No

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by mister_e View Post
    Serial communication is a female thing, so bear in mind that preamble are needed and some of them may say the size don't make any difference
    ---------------------------------------------------------
    Usually 3-5 $AA as preamble is enough. Machester encoding have it's own advantage if you send long data packet. A checksum is also handy.

    I don't think the character pacing (pause x) is really needed if you're using a slow baudrate (2400 bauds or so)

    a single SEROUT/DEBUG/SEROUT2/HSEROUT line is all you need in many case.

    Always make sure your crystal are accurate.

    BTW which PIC are you using?
    I'm using PIC16F88. I have 4 $55 and am using Manchester Encoding.

  18. #18
    skimask's Avatar
    skimask Guest


    Did you find this post helpful? Yes | No

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by oneohthree View Post
    I'm using PIC16F88. I have 4 $55 and am using Manchester Encoding.
    So...
    oneofthree = jyi1 ???

  19. #19
    Join Date
    Dec 2005
    Posts
    1,073


    Did you find this post helpful? Yes | No

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by oneohthree View Post
    I am using the digital data output pin. Also, since I need to send my data 5 times and with a pause of 5 does it mean that I should make my preamble longer?
    I would use a 5ms pulse as the preamble and a 20ms pause between data packets (it allows the AGC and threshold to reset).
    On the receiving end I would use PulsIn to wait for the 5ms pulse and then go into the normal receive routine once it's received. Using some type of error detection (e.g. checksum) is a necessity.

    What range do you need? How much data do you need to send?

    Looking at the digital data pin with a 'scope (or recording it with a soundcard as I suggested earlier) can eliminate a lot of guesswork by telling you whether your signal strength is adequate. I find it invaluable.

  20. #20
    skimask's Avatar
    skimask Guest


    Did you find this post helpful? Yes | No

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by dhouston View Post
    I would use a 5ms pulse as the preamble and a 20ms pause between data packets (it allows the AGC and threshold to reset).
    I'm curious as to why you use the 20ms pause between packets? I know you said that the pause would reset the AGC & threshold, and that certainly makes sense. But I would figure if you're continuously sending bi-phase encoded data (manchester encoded) practically non-stop, wouldn't everything stay where it would need to be?

    EDIT: (add)
    I suppose if the TX and RX were changing positions relative to each other, the signal strength would vary, and maybe the AGC/threshold wouldn't 'keep up' with the varying conditions. The 20ms pause would compensate. If that's the case, then it really makes a lot more sense to me.
    Last edited by skimask; - 25th April 2007 at 03:46. Reason: Thought about it for a bit...

  21. #21
    Join Date
    Apr 2007
    Posts
    9


    Did you find this post helpful? Yes | No

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by dhouston View Post
    I would use a 5ms pulse as the preamble and a 20ms pause between data packets (it allows the AGC and threshold to reset).
    On the receiving end I would use PulsIn to wait for the 5ms pulse and then go into the normal receive routine once it's received. Using some type of error detection (e.g. checksum) is a necessity.

    What range do you need? How much data do you need to send?

    Looking at the digital data pin with a 'scope (or recording it with a soundcard as I suggested earlier) can eliminate a lot of guesswork by telling you whether your signal strength is adequate. I find it invaluable.
    Is the code that I wrote below what you are trying to tell me?
    I am only trying to send 4 bits (8 bits encoded). I looked at the digital data pin of the scope and my signal has an amplitude of about 3.72 v.

    Transmit:
    Pulsout PORTB.7, 500
    Pause 20000
    serout PORTB.7, n2400, [$aa,encoded2]
    Pause 20000

    Receive:
    Wait55:
    Pulsin PORTB.0,1,ct55
    If ct55 = 500 Then
    goto Waitaa
    Else
    goto Wait55
    Endif
    'goto Wait55

    Waitaa:
    serin PORTB.0, n2400, encoded1
    If encoded1 <> $aa Then goto Maina
    serin PORTB.0, n2400, encoded1
    write 0, encoded1

  22. #22
    Join Date
    Nov 2003
    Location
    Greece
    Posts
    3,810


    Did you find this post helpful? Yes | No

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by skimask View Post
    So...
    oneofthree = jyi1 ???
    You are such a tease...!

    oneofthree or jyi1 or whatever your name is (we never got any) I told you before to start one data byte at the time. A complex program is hard to debug especially if there are serial com's.

    Also do not manchester encode the preambles. Only the data bytes and CRC or Checksum.

    Ioannis
    Last edited by Ioannis; - 25th April 2007 at 07:48.

  23. #23
    Join Date
    Jul 2003
    Location
    USA - Arizona
    Posts
    156


    Did you find this post helpful? Yes | No

    Default

    I looked back at some previous projects I have done with wireless comms. I have not used the Laipac modules, but have used the RFPICs and the Radiotronix modules.

    I have used 1200 baud with one preamble, two start-of-transmission identifiers (STX), and one end-of-transmission (ETX) identifier. The packet data is between these wrappers. In my experience the manchester coding did not help much with short messages.

    The only thing I was able to find was the following comments in my code:
    Code:
    /* for wireless link, the "invert" option should not be used
    as this causes the transmitter to iddle on */
    My point is, have you tried your code with T2400 (as opposed to N2400)?

  24. #24
    Join Date
    Dec 2005
    Posts
    1,073


    Did you find this post helpful? Yes | No

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by languer View Post
    I looked back at some previous projects I have done with wireless comms. I have not used the Laipac modules, but have used the RFPICs and the Radiotronix modules.
    The Radiotronix RCR receivers are clones of the Wenshing/Laipac receivers. The only difference is they number the pins in reverse order. I think Radiotronix gets them from Cansec in China.

  25. #25
    Join Date
    Dec 2005
    Posts
    1,073


    Did you find this post helpful? Yes | No

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by jyi1 View Post
    Is the code that I wrote below what you are trying to tell me?
    I am only trying to send 4 bits (8 bits encoded). I looked at the digital data pin of the scope and my signal has an amplitude of about 3.72 v.
    Code:
    Transmit:
    	Pulsout PORTB.7, 500
    	Pause 20000
    	serout PORTB.7, n2400, [$aa,encoded2]
    	Pause 20000
    
    Receive: 
    Wait55:
            Pulsin PORTB.0,1,ct55
            If ct55 = 500 Then 
               goto Waitaa
            Else
              goto Wait55
            Endif
            'goto Wait55
    Yes, more or less. I would change it to...
    Code:
    Transmit:
    	Pulsout PORTB.7, 500
    	Pause 2500     'shorten space
    	serout PORTB.7, n2400, [$aa,encoded2]
    	Pause 20000
    
    Receive: 
    Wait55:
            Pulsin PORTB.0,1,ct55
            If ct55 < 450 Then Wait55
            goto Waitaa
    The important thing with the signal is that it be clean with no noise pulses interspersed with the data.

    With only 4 bits, I think I would use a variation of the NEC protocol, sending only 1 byte with each code. The NEC protocol has error detection built in so you can discard any corrupted codes. Read the NEC protocol documentation in the link I cited earlier and if you still have questions I'll try to answer them here.

  26. #26
    Join Date
    Apr 2007
    Posts
    9


    Did you find this post helpful? Yes | No

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by languer View Post
    I looked back at some previous projects I have done with wireless comms. I have not used the Laipac modules, but have used the RFPICs and the Radiotronix modules.

    I have used 1200 baud with one preamble, two start-of-transmission identifiers (STX), and one end-of-transmission (ETX) identifier. The packet data is between these wrappers. In my experience the manchester coding did not help much with short messages.

    The only thing I was able to find was the following comments in my code:
    Code:
    /* for wireless link, the "invert" option should not be used
    as this causes the transmitter to iddle on */
    My point is, have you tried your code with T2400 (as opposed to N2400)?
    T2400 doesn't really help.

  27. #27
    Join Date
    Apr 2007
    Posts
    9


    Did you find this post helpful? Yes | No

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by dhouston View Post
    Yes, more or less. I would change it to...
    Code:
    Transmit:
    	Pulsout PORTB.7, 500
    	Pause 2500     'shorten space
    	serout PORTB.7, n2400, [$aa,encoded2]
    	Pause 20000
    
    Receive: 
    Wait55:
            Pulsin PORTB.0,1,ct55
            If ct55 < 450 Then Wait55
            goto Waitaa
    The important thing with the signal is that it be clean with no noise pulses interspersed with the data.

    With only 4 bits, I think I would use a variation of the NEC protocol, sending only 1 byte with each code. The NEC protocol has error detection built in so you can discard any corrupted codes. Read the NEC protocol documentation in the link I cited earlier and if you still have questions I'll try to answer them here.
    I tested out the above code thats included in my code and it does not work by wireless or by wire.

  28. #28
    Join Date
    Dec 2005
    Posts
    1,073


    Did you find this post helpful? Yes | No

    Default

    I'm not going to try to read your unformatted code or write the entire application but here are code snippets that show you what you need to do. It sends 4 bits both "as is" and as bitwise complement using a variation of the NEC protocol. I've hardcoded the 4 bits of data as 1101. This is adapted from code I use to send and receive 2-4 bytes so the pins are the ones I used. There are more efficient ways to do things but I've tried to show it step-by-step so you see the logic.
    Code:
    '-----Transmit-----
    SendRF: wb.0=data0  '00000001
            wb.1=data1  '00000001 
            wb.2=data2  '00000101
            wb.3=data3  '00001101
            wb=~wb      '11110010
            wb=wb<<4    '00100000
            wb.0=data0  '00100001
            wb.1=data1  '00100001
            wb.2=data2  '00100101
            wb.3=data3  '00101101
            'bits 0-3=data, bits 4-7=~data
            Low 4
    	For c=1 To Copies
    	  PulsOut 4, 500
              PauseUs 2500
    	  For i=0 To 7
    	    PulsOut 4, 50
    	    If wb.0=1 Then
    	      PauseUs 1500
    	    Else
    	      PauseUs 500
    	    EndIf 
    	    wb=wb>>1
    	  Next
    	  PulsOut 4, 50
    	  Pause 20			
    	Next
    
    '-----Receive-----	
    DEFINE PULSIN_MAX = 550
    	
    RcvRF:  PulsIn GPIO.1, 1, STX
            wb=0
            If STX<450 Then RcvRF
            While GPIO.1=0:Wend
            For i = 0 To 7
              PulsIn GPIO.1, 0, space
              If (space<40) Or (space>175) Then RcvRF
              If (space>75) Then
                wb.0=1				
              EndIf
              wb=wb<<1
            Next i	
            comp=wb>>4
            wb=wb & 7
            If wb + comp = 15 Then
              'wb is good data
            Else
              'wb is corrupt
            EndIf
    Last edited by dhouston; - 25th April 2007 at 20:59.

  29. #29
    Join Date
    Apr 2007
    Posts
    9


    Did you find this post helpful? Yes | No

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by dhouston View Post
    I'm not going to try to read your unformatted code or write the entire application but here are code snippets that show you what you need to do. It sends 4 bits both "as is" and as bitwise complement using a variation of the NEC protocol. I've hardcoded the 4 bits of data as 1101. This is adapted from code I use to send and receive 2-4 bytes so the pins are the ones I used. There are more efficient ways to do things but I've tried to show it step-by-step so you see the logic.
    Code:
    '-----Transmit-----
    SendRF: wb.0=data0  '00000001
            wb.1=data1  '00000001 
            wb.2=data2  '00000101
            wb.3=data3  '00001101
            wb=~wb      '11110010
            wb=wb<<4    '00100000
            wb.0=data0  '00100001
            wb.1=data1  '00100001
            wb.2=data2  '00100101
            wb.3=data3  '00101101
            'bits 0-3=data, bits 4-7=~data
            Low 4
    	For c=1 To Copies
    	  PulsOut 4, 500
              PauseUs 2500
    	  For i=0 To 7
    	    PulsOut 4, 50
    	    If wb.0=1 Then
    	      PauseUs 1500
    	    Else
    	      PauseUs 500
    	    EndIf 
    	    wb=wb>>1
    	  Next
    	  PulsOut 4, 50
    	  Pause 20			
    	Next
    
    '-----Receive-----	
    DEFINE PULSIN_MAX = 550
    	
    RcvRF:  PulsIn GPIO.1, 1, STX
            wb=0
            If STX<450 Then RcvRF
            While GPIO.1=0:Wend
            For i = 0 To 7
              PulsIn GPIO.1, 0, space
              If (space<40) Or (space>175) Then RcvRF
              If (space>75) Then
                wb.0=1				
              EndIf
              wb=wb<<1
            Next i	
            comp=wb>>4
            wb=wb & 7
            If wb + comp = 15 Then
              'wb is good data
            Else
              'wb is corrupt
            EndIf
    If I were to run your code to test it would I code data0=0000001, data1=00000001, data2=00000101, data3=00001101 and then code data0=001000001, data1=00100001, data3=00100101, data3=00101101? Also in the for c=1 to Copies, what is Copies supposed to mean?Also, I discover that when I use my old code and send it through once and view the digital output of the receiver and transmitter input the on the oscilloscope the sequence appears but it does not get picked up by the microcontroller.
    Last edited by jyi1; - 25th April 2007 at 22:26.

  30. #30
    skimask's Avatar
    skimask Guest


    Did you find this post helpful? Yes | No

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by jyi1 View Post
    If I were to run your code to test it would I code data0=0000001, data1=00000001, data2=00000101, data3=00001101 and then code data0=001000001, data1=00100001, data3=00100101, data3=00101101? Also in the for c=1 to Copies, what is Copies supposed to mean?Also, I discover that when I use my old code and send it through once and view the digital output of the receiver and transmitter input the on the oscilloscope the sequence appears but it does not get picked up by the microcontroller.
    Call me crazy...but I think between this thread and the other one, you're making the program/process entirely much harder than it needs to be...

  31. #31
    Join Date
    Dec 2005
    Posts
    1,073


    Did you find this post helpful? Yes | No

    Default

    data0-data7 represents the 8 bits of the single byte being transmitted.
    Code:
            data.bit0 = 1
            data.bit1 = 0
            data.bit2 = 1
            data.bit3 = 1
            data.bit4 = 0
            data.bit5 = 1
            data.bit6 = 0
            data.bit7 = 0
    Copies means the number of times the transmission is repeated. You will need to experiment. If you always have a strong signal you might get by with a single copy; a weaker signal will require additional copies to set the receiver AGC and threshold. Most X-10 RF transmitters send 5 copies.

    What I usually do on the receiving end is report the first valid code and then only report subsequent codes if they differ - with a time limit based on the time required to send the five (or whatever) copies.

  32. #32
    Join Date
    Jul 2003
    Location
    USA - Arizona
    Posts
    156


    Did you find this post helpful? Yes | No

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by jyi1 View Post
    I am using the Laipac 315 MHz RF modules and I serout only once and it works with wires 100% of the time. When I try wireless it works once in a while. On the other hand, when I serout 5 times the wireless works most of the time but does not work once in a while. I have added 4 $55s for a preamble and manchester encoded everything.
    I think skimask has a very good point. You started with the statement above and are now deeper than you could ever imagine. There is a subtle truth to the KISS principle, it works and it is simple.

    • What are your expectations?
    • Do you have something that works 4-out-of-5 times? I mean you send the message 5 times and you receive it 4.
    • Where you expecting the link to work 100% of the time? If so, do you know what your link budget is? Do you now how much margin you have? What distance you need to cover?
    • I do not know of any comm system that works 100% of the time. The best systems (very expensive) use redundancy, error correction, complex modulation schemes, etc. Normal systems (i.e. remotes, sensors, telemetry) usually just encode and send several times.
    • You pick what you think you need in terms of reliability and no more usually. If you have way more, you over-designed it (your wasting battery power, causing unintended radiation, or something else).

    I am not trying to persuade you from making something better. But seeing how complicated it is getting, do you really need it this complex? Or can you keep your manchester coded signal (which apparently is already working) send it a few times and only use the first one that passes a CRC check or something like that?

  33. #33
    Join Date
    Dec 2005
    Posts
    1,073


    Did you find this post helpful? Yes | No

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by skimask View Post
    Call me crazy...but I think between this thread and the other one, you're making the program/process entirely much harder than it needs to be...
    OK. You're crazy!

  34. #34
    skimask's Avatar
    skimask Guest


    Did you find this post helpful? Yes | No

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by languer View Post
    I think skimask has a very good point. You started with the statement above and are now deeper than you could ever imagine. There is a subtle truth to the KISS principle, it works and it is simple.
    And one other point I might make...
    The 432-433Mhz modules seems to work, the 315 doesn't.
    Why not use 2 432-433Mhz modules, one master, one slave. Sure you can't use them both at the same time, bidirectionally. But for instance, maybe the slave will ONLY answer after the master has spoken. Use a PICs pin to provide power to the modules, turn off the master's receiver while it's transmitting, turn off the transmitter while it's receiving, and so on with the slave, only the other way around in reverse...
    I think I get what the end result is supposed to be, with changing all the bits around and sending the modified code back. But why not let the PIC handle the bit changing after receiving a certain code or something along those lines.

    OK. You're crazy!
    __________________
    www.davehouston.net
    YES!!!

  35. #35
    Join Date
    Dec 2005
    Posts
    1,073


    Did you find this post helpful? Yes | No

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by jyi1 View Post
    If I were to run your code to test it would I code data0=0000001, data1=00000001, data2=00000101, data3=00001101 and then code data0=001000001, data1=00100001, data3=00100101, data3=00101101?
    You said you are sending 4 bits of data. My example was intended to show you how to send the 4 bits twice in two different ways. One way is "as is" in the lower 4 bits of wb; the other way is as the bitwise complement of the 4 data bits in the upper 4 bits of wb. Sending it in two forms allows us to check for errors on the receiving end.

    Assuming you want to send %1101...
    Code:
    data=%1101
    wb=data
    wb=~wb
    wb=wb<<4        'bitwise complement %0010 in upper 4 bits 
    wb=wb+data      'data "as is" in lower 4 bits
    The attached GIF shows the waveform for data=%1101.
    Attached Images Attached Images  
    Last edited by dhouston; - 26th April 2007 at 13:18. Reason: Replaced the GIF - original had bit order reversed

  36. #36
    Join Date
    Dec 2005
    Posts
    1,073


    Did you find this post helpful? Yes | No

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by skimask View Post
    I'm curious as to why you use the 20ms pause between packets? I know you said that the pause would reset the AGC & threshold, and that certainly makes sense. But I would figure if you're continuously sending bi-phase encoded data (manchester encoded) practically non-stop, wouldn't everything stay where it would need to be?
    AGC reduces the gain as the signal gets stronger. Repeating the signal at close intervals can cause the gain to taper off, resulting in poorer reception. A gap between transmissions lets it reset to its baseline. You can play with the duration of the gap - in this case 5-10mS is probably adequate but its hard to say without hands-on experience to determine typical signal strength and performance. Also, I'm eliminating the manchester encoding - the NEC protocol assures a relatively balanced ratio of pulses/spaces for the dataslicer threshold.

    Another reason for inserting a gap is to allow the receiver time to analyze what it has received and decide what action to take.

    It is possible to get a measure of signal strength by taking ADC readings of the receiver's Linear output pin. I measure the difference between a pulse and space which, while it is not an absolute measure (due to AGC), gives a good relative indication of signal strength. IOW, if one signal registers 700 and another 500 I know which signal is stronger (and can use it for tuning) but I cannot definitively compare measurements from separate receivers since I'm not measuring an absolute magnitude.
    Last edited by dhouston; - 26th April 2007 at 13:28.

  37. #37
    skimask's Avatar
    skimask Guest


    Did you find this post helpful? Yes | No

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by dhouston View Post
    AGC reduces the gain as the signal gets stronger......since I'm not measuring an absolute magnitude.
    Everything you said makes perfect sense to me. And it might also explain a few issues I've always had with a couple of my RF projects and lengthy/continuous packet transmissions getting dropped after a few seconds of transmitting. I'm going to try your 'pause between packets'/'making the packets smaller' idea and see what happens.

  38. #38
    Join Date
    Nov 2003
    Location
    Greece
    Posts
    3,810


    Did you find this post helpful? Yes | No

    Default

    I can understand that the issues you had might be module related. I never had any problems with FM modules and the ones I designed with the classic slicer approach (given that the proper transmission rules are followed). A good receiver should work 24/7 with no problem.

    Ioannis

  39. #39
    skimask's Avatar
    skimask Guest


    Did you find this post helpful? Yes | No

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Ioannis View Post
    I can understand that the issues you had might be module related. I never had any problems with FM modules and the ones I designed with the classic slicer approach (given that the proper transmission rules are followed). A good receiver should work 24/7 with no problem.
    Ioannis
    It's not really 'problems' I have with the modules. They work fine for me, in bursts. I have a couple of project where one of my remotes acts sort of like a volume control and I have to continuously hold the transmit button down to get the receiver to change, takes about 15 seconds to run from one end to the other. About 3 or 4 seconds into holding the button, it craps out. If I release the button for less than a second and press it again, it'll work for another 3-4 seconds, then repeat. Again, no real problems, and I have a feeling that dhouston's hints earlier may solves this issue.

  40. #40
    Join Date
    Dec 2005
    Posts
    1,073


    Did you find this post helpful? Yes | No

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by skimask View Post
    Everything you said makes perfect sense to me. And it might also explain a few issues I've always had with a couple of my RF projects and lengthy/continuous packet transmissions getting dropped after a few seconds of transmitting. I'm going to try your 'pause between packets'/'making the packets smaller' idea and see what happens.
    Almost all of my experience is with these specific superregenerative ASK receivers (at various frequencies) or with very similar superregenerative receivers. My suggestions may not apply if you're using more sophisticated receivers (e.g. superheterodyne) or FSK. Most of my applications send/receive 2-3 payload bytes. I think a wireless RS232 link and manchester encoding is overly complicated for such simple needs. If there's a need to send lengthy text or data streams, a superheterodyne or FSK receiver and a wireless RS232 link may make more sense.

    I cited the following web page earlier in the thread.You can see the effects of AGC on the initial pulse in the top trace of the first 'scope screenshot. The slope is from the AGC reacting to the wide pulse. You can see the slope starting in the other direction after the pulse ends. If you look a a lot of 'scope screenshots you'll see the same (less pronounced) effect even between the data pulses and see more pronounced differences between a closely spaced series of 0-bit (narrow space) versus 1-bit (wider space). Of course, it's affected by the absolute pulse space widths as well.

    The bottom picture is of a signal captured as a .WAV file with a soundcard. You can see that it's more difficult to discern a signal when it has no pronounced initial pulse to set the AGC. In this case, it's the signal sent by a Pronto touchscreen to a Philips RF extender. The three copies of the preamble contain information to address a specific RF extender and set its carrier frequency, etc. which must precede the actual IR code the extender is meant to relay. Philips doesn't use a superregenerative reveiver and they take other steps to improve reception (double modulation) but the picture illustrates the weaknesses of using no preamble or a narrow lead-in pulse with a superregenerative receiver.

Similar Threads

  1. Wireless Tachometer - Design Help
    By DanPBP in forum Off Topic
    Replies: 2
    Last Post: - 3rd May 2009, 09:06
  2. RS485 Vs Wireless (TWS-434A)
    By koossa in forum Off Topic
    Replies: 3
    Last Post: - 11th April 2009, 12:40
  3. Serial Wireless
    By mackrackit in forum mel PIC BASIC Pro
    Replies: 4
    Last Post: - 29th May 2007, 16:06
  4. Serial comm - are 2 wires for TX only enough?
    By flotulopex in forum mel PIC BASIC Pro
    Replies: 9
    Last Post: - 30th August 2006, 03:23
  5. RS 485 wireless communication
    By Armadus in forum mel PIC BASIC Pro
    Replies: 22
    Last Post: - 26th January 2006, 19:30

Members who have read this thread : 1

You do not have permission to view the list of names.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts