Not recommended for new designs?


Closed Thread
Results 1 to 9 of 9
  1. #1

    Default Not recommended for new designs?

    Yesterday, I called digi key to get some pic's and gave them 3 or 4 different part numbers (of completely different chips), only to hear not recommended for new design.

    The guy at DK thought it may be the fact that they will just do new part numbers when everything is ROHS ready.

    I wanted a couple smaller package, fewer I/O chips to compliment my 16c65 that I use.

    Ended up ordering the 12c509 and the 16c716, both of which had that "warning" on them.

    Does anyone know, if these will be valid parts in the future and indeed, they are just saying that because of ROHS?

    Thanks.

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Jul 2003
    Posts
    2,405


    Did you find this post helpful? Yes | No

    Default

    Older parts are being replaced by newer parts all the time. Not recommended for new designs is just Microchips way of letting the designer know certain parts are being phased out. If you're designing a new product you'll want to steer clear of parts being phased out.

    If you're just working on one-off hobby projects, use anything you can get your hands on, but just remember the parts you use now may not be available down the road a ways.

    Rohs compliance is a big factor, but Microchip was doing this long before Rohs was even an issue. Direct replacements that are just better, and different manufacturing techniques that make direct replacements less expensive to manufacture are also reasons for phasing out older parts.
    Regards,

    -Bruce
    tech at rentron.com
    http://www.rentron.com

  3. #3


    Did you find this post helpful? Yes | No

    Default

    Yeah, I know what it means and I always stay clear but I every part number I gave yesterday had that message.

    If anyone can confirm the ROHS theory, I'd appreciate it....the guy at DK said one manufacturer put that on every single part but the only change will be ROHS certified with a different part number......same part though.

    Are the OTP parts going to bite the dust?

    I use them because of this antique P16pro40 programmer I have.

    I may just have to call microchip.

  4. #4


    Did you find this post helpful? Yes | No

    Default

    Answering my own question an FYI to all.

    It's the OTP parts that have this not recommended message....at least the ones I inquired about.

    So time for a new programmer and some 12F509 to play with.

    Unless anyone knows if a P16pro40 can be made to work with a 12F509?

  5. #5
    Join Date
    Jan 2006
    Location
    Toronto
    Posts
    109


    Did you find this post helpful? Yes | No

    Default

    It will support the 12F629 and 12F675 using the free version of the software from www.picallw.com.

  6. #6


    Did you find this post helpful? Yes | No

    Default

    winpicprog at this site
    http://www.winpicprog.co.uk/bbs/viewtopic.php?t=235
    supports almost all flash pics with a 16pro40

  7. #7
    Join Date
    Oct 2005
    Location
    Pinckney, Michigan
    Posts
    91


    Did you find this post helpful? Yes | No

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Michael
    Yesterday, I called digi key to get some pic's and gave them 3 or 4 different part numbers (of completely different chips), only to hear not recommended for new design.
    Thanks.
    Many times, just the suffix is changing, typically do to a new die fab. The 16F876 eventually popped up as "not recommended for new design" as I recall, in favor of the 16F876A, which simply offered additional features or fixed a bug, etc.

  8. #8


    Did you find this post helpful? Yes | No

    Default

    Thanks BBarney....that's great. Hate to give up my P16....have 2 of them, one on a pretty nice chassis I made for it.

    Ended up getting a bunch of 12F509.

  9. #9


    Did you find this post helpful? Yes | No

    Default

    if it doesn't work for them just ask Nigel about it,he's always upgrading the chips it handles

Similar Threads

  1. Replies: 0
    Last Post: - 29th August 2008, 05:54
  2. EasyPIC5 recommended project sources
    By manwolf in forum mel PIC BASIC Pro
    Replies: 14
    Last Post: - 13th June 2008, 00:46
  3. Re: Recommended PCB foot prints
    By Steve_88 in forum Off Topic
    Replies: 0
    Last Post: - 30th June 2007, 17:56
  4. RF designs
    By Travin77 in forum mel PIC BASIC Pro
    Replies: 3
    Last Post: - 14th June 2006, 07:50

Members who have read this thread : 1

You do not have permission to view the list of names.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts