Code:
Program start with PBP
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
255,042,068,042,000,000,000,000,000,000
ERROR_OUT: 255
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
255,042,068,042,001,002,003,004,005,006
ERROR_OUT: 234
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
255,042,068,042,001,002,004,008,016,032
ERROR_OUT: 192
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
255,042,068,042,045,091,110,200,201,199
ERROR_OUT: 177
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
255,042,068,042,045,097,210,225,079,120
ERROR_OUT: 247
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
255,042,068,042,123,123,123,123,123,123
ERROR_OUT: 029
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
255,042,068,042,092,091,090,091,092,093
ERROR_OUT: 218
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
255,042,068,042,255,255,255,255,255,255
ERROR_OUT: 005
---------------------------------------
Program start with PBP
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
255,042,068,042,000,000,000,000,000,000
ERROR_OUT: 255
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
255,042,068,042,001,002,003,004,005,006
ERROR_OUT: 234
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
255,042,068,042,001,002,004,008,016,032
ERROR_OUT: 192
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
255,042,068,042,045,091,110,200,201,199
ERROR_OUT: 177
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
255,042,068,042,045,097,210,225,079,120
ERROR_OUT: 247
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
255,042,068,042,123,123,123,123,123,123
ERROR_OUT: 029
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
255,042,068,042,092,091,090,091,092,093
ERROR_OUT: 218
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
255,042,068,042,255,255,255,255,255,255
ERROR_OUT: 005
Now, this IS with PBP3 but I'd be surprised if using PBP2.60C would make it any different. For reference, here's the exact code I used to generate the above output, compiled once with PBP and once witl PBPL:
Bookmarks