Search Results - MEL PICBASIC Forum


Search:

Type: Posts; User: HenrikOlsson; Keyword(s):

Search: Search took 0.03 seconds.

  1. Replies
    30
    Views
    13,959

    Re: PBP 3.0 really needed?

    I'm sorry but I'm afraid you're mistaken, variables most certainly WAS modified. I'm not talking about "your" variables, I'm talking about PBPs internal variables.
    You say that it's a lot "cleaner"...
  2. Replies
    30
    Views
    13,959

    Re: PBP 3.0 really needed?

    In the end your compiled PBP statements are ASM too so yes, in theory, you can do that but remember that the PBP statements you use in that ISR might use the same system variables as your main...
  3. Replies
    30
    Views
    13,959

    Re: PBP 3.0 really needed?

    This comes up now and then and although I agree that the development of PBP is kind of slow I fail to see how a PBP command to handle something like PPS would even work. I mean setting the output of...
  4. Replies
    30
    Views
    13,959

    Re: PBP 3.0 really needed?

    Hi,
    I don't think MELABS is going to add support for new devices in the old version of the compiler but if you're only using devices supported by your current version and you then that's fine....
Results 1 to 4 of 4