http://www.picbasic.co.uk/forum/showthread.php?t=20161
Type: Posts; User: rmteo; Keyword(s):
http://www.picbasic.co.uk/forum/showthread.php?t=20161
Using serial commands (SEROUT or HSEROUT) only. Command Set Reference PDF. Some examples of 4d displays and what they can do.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZwrGd3aVriQ
...
And why not? Look at the comments of the poster.
Actually that is an answer for your level of IQ.
Why should it differ?
Electrically Eraseable Programmable Read Only Memory.
Code folding is a feature of some text editors, source code editors, and IDEs that allows the user to selectively hide and display – "fold" – sections of a currently-edited file as a part of routine...
Won't ever happen (outside of the hobby/education market) due to its many limitations/shortcomings.
What I said from the very beginning. :rolleyes:
Sounds like you are wanting to deal with asynchronous events. If that is the case, then the "EXIt BY INTERRUPT" feature should be used.
Wrong approach to the problem. Answered this question here http://www.picbasic.co.uk/forum/showthread.php?t=20136
Pseudocode:
mainloop:
Sleep ; go to sleep
on interrupt do something ; wake-up and jump to your ISR
goto mainloop: ; return here
The figure you are seeing is exactly what the data sheet says, run current at 64MHz should be in the range of 7-12mA. Put the MCU to SLEEP and see if it goes down to <10uA range - if not then it is...
You are not using the features of the MCU correctly. Sleep current of the PIC18F46K80 is anything from 200nA (0.0002mA) to 10uA (0.01mA) depending on temperature and VDD (according to to the data...
Then why do you need to run at 1MHz? You can achieve an average current consumption of <0.4mA by running the clock at 64MHz (according to data in your post) - far less than the 1.04mA that you are...
Yah, but is your CPU in a low power mode such SLEEP when it is doing nothing?
The proper way to do this (low power consumption for battery use) is to use the low power modes of the MCU and NOT to lower the clock speed.
They wont simulate PBP (or its hex) code. However, they all include in the price their own BASIC compiler (not compatible with but much more fully featured then PBP) and IDE (with which you can...
This post will probaby be deleted (like skimask's entire thread) for mentioning the advantages of a superior competitive product.
As long as you are doing simple hobby stuff (and DIP packages are pretty much irrelevant outside of the hobby and experimental arenas), sure, stay with PBP and PICs. If you must have a high level of...
As you said "when an STM32F415 costs the same as a PIC18Fxxxx" why even bother.
http://www.picbasic.co.uk/forum/showthread.php?t=19652&p=130436#post130436
If you think this is bad, take a look at the Microchip Forums - 100+ spam posts daily for months now.
7184
96xRGBx64 Full color graphic OLED module
24.8mmW x 30.42mmH x 1.42mmD
Extremely wide viewing angles
Very high contrast ratio
Built-in Solomon SSD1332 Controller
8-bit parallel interface or SPI...
Sorry, no.