2 big projects in the past 2 years. Fair money makers too. Prototyped them in PBP using 'available' PICs, and by available I mean supported by PBP, PIC18F87J50.
Worked fine, but ran short of I/O...
Type: Posts; User: skimask; Keyword(s):
2 big projects in the past 2 years. Fair money makers too. Prototyped them in PBP using 'available' PICs, and by available I mean supported by PBP, PIC18F87J50.
Worked fine, but ran short of I/O...
Somedays I couldn't agree more, but at the moment, abstraction and familiarity. I'm sure in a few years, that'll likely change completely. Familiar with PICs, know them inside and out, and I'm...
Nope, not the "8-bit limitations" at all. Sure, I'd like to use PBP with the new 80 & 100 pin TQFP's. But that's not the point. There's also plenty of <28 pin PICs with newer features.
3 years....
Nothing?
https://goo.gl/maps/Jnksb
This is it?
3 years of practically nothing new?
Yep.
Done and done...
Quit using TOGGLE. It's a R/M/W instruction. Set it high, pause, set it low, pause, loop.
Osccon = %01100001
So, what's the deal with PBP now that DT has passed? Is it abandon-ware or what? No updates in what...3+ years or so?
I don't know about the rest of the die-hard PBP users in the world, but...