Search Results - MEL PICBASIC Forum


Search:

Type: Posts; User: skimask; Keyword(s):

Search: Search took 0.00 seconds.

  1. Thread: Future PBP

    by skimask
    Replies
    19
    Views
    47,074

    Re: Future PBP

    2 big projects in the past 2 years. Fair money makers too. Prototyped them in PBP using 'available' PICs, and by available I mean supported by PBP, PIC18F87J50.
    Worked fine, but ran short of I/O...
  2. Thread: Future PBP

    by skimask
    Replies
    19
    Views
    47,074

    Re: Future PBP

    Somedays I couldn't agree more, but at the moment, abstraction and familiarity. I'm sure in a few years, that'll likely change completely. Familiar with PICs, know them inside and out, and I'm...
  3. Thread: Future PBP

    by skimask
    Replies
    19
    Views
    47,074

    Re: Future PBP

    Nope, not the "8-bit limitations" at all. Sure, I'd like to use PBP with the new 80 & 100 pin TQFP's. But that's not the point. There's also plenty of <28 pin PICs with newer features.

    3 years....
  4. Thread: Future PBP

    by skimask
    Replies
    19
    Views
    47,074

    Re: Future PBP

    Nothing?

    https://goo.gl/maps/Jnksb

    This is it?
    3 years of practically nothing new?

    Yep.

    Done and done...
  5. Replies
    19
    Views
    12,738

    Re: PIC16F886 not running.

    Quit using TOGGLE. It's a R/M/W instruction. Set it high, pause, set it low, pause, loop.
  6. Replies
    19
    Views
    12,738

    Re: PIC16F886 not running.

    Osccon = %01100001
  7. Thread: Future PBP

    by skimask
    Replies
    19
    Views
    47,074

    Future PBP

    So, what's the deal with PBP now that DT has passed? Is it abandon-ware or what? No updates in what...3+ years or so?

    I don't know about the rest of the die-hard PBP users in the world, but...
Results 1 to 7 of 7