I assume your answer would be the same for other sources of interrupt (other then TMR0).
In any case, 3 uS is more then good enough for my case.
Thanks very much DT.
Type: Posts; User: sayzer; Keyword(s):
I assume your answer would be the same for other sources of interrupt (other then TMR0).
In any case, 3 uS is more then good enough for my case.
Thanks very much DT.
Hi DT,
When @ INT_DISABLE TMR0_INT command is used @4Mhz 16F628A, can you estimate how long does it take to process it and eventually disable it?
uS?
Thanks.
Thanks IO.
I already knew about delay issues but it takes approx. 30 seconds for my code to complete int routine. So my code is not time sensitive.
What I needed to know was DT's warnings about...
Hi DT,
This question is not related to the current ongoing subject but is about your int routine.
Is it safe (or how safe) to call a subroutine inside your interrupt handler?
Or inside PBP...
Hi Ioannis,
Actually I tried different codes after this experiment and came up with these simple results.
1. In a relatively large code, DT's 18F int routine saves a lot of code space compared...
The interesting part is that I did not change anything other the "int" part.
That is why it was surprising and "Really very interesting for me".
Hi DT,
I wanted to post a "thank you" (also as an informative post).
For the first time ever, I used your 18F routine (with RX_INT) about a minute ago.
I saved 3100 bytes!!!
Really very...